The universe of propositional approximations

Description logics provide powerful languages for representing and reasoning about knowledge of static application domains. The main strength of description logics is that they offer considerable expressive power going far beyond propositional logic, while reasoning is still decidable. There is a demand to bring the power and character of description logics into the description and reasoning of dynamic application domains which are characterized by actions. In this paper, based on a combination of the propositional dynamic logic PDL, a family of description logics and an action formalism constructed over description logics, we propose a family of dynamic description logics DDL(X @) for representing and reasoning about actions, where X represents well-studied description logics ranging from the to the , and X @ denotes the extension of X with the @ constructor. The representation power of DDL(X @) is reflected in four aspects. Firstly, the static knowledge of application domains is represented as RBoxes and acyclic TBoxes of the description logic X. Secondly, the states of the world and the pre-conditions of atomic actions are described by ABox assertions of the description logic X @, and the post-conditions of atomic actions are described by primitive literals of X @. Thirdly, starting with atomic actions and ABox assertions of X @, complex actions are constructed with regular program constructors of PDL, so that various control structures on actions such as the "Sequence", "Choice", "Any-Order", "Iterate", "If-Then-Else", "Repeat-While" and "Repeat-Until" can be represented. Finally, both atomic actions and complex actions are used as modal operators for the construction of formulas, so that many properties on actions can be explicitly stated by formulas. A tableau-algorithm is provided for deciding the satisfiability of DDL(X @)-formulas; based on this algorithm, reasoning tasks such as the realizability, executability and projection of actions can be effectively carried out. As a result, DDL(X @) not only offers considerable expressive power going beyond many action formalisms which are propositional, but also provides decidable reasoning services for actions described by it.

The first results in proof theory were obtained using axiomatic systems of logical deduction. The chapter develops propositional and predicate logic in such an axiomatic system. It shows how reasoning under assumption can be regained in an axiomatic system by proving the so-called “deduction theorem” propositional logic (and later, predicate logic as well). The deduction theorem provides the opportunity to introduce one of the main tools needed for proving properties of formal systems, namely, proof by induction on the natural numbers. The differences between minimal, intuitionistic, and classical systems of logic according to the properties of negation characterizing each of the systems are outlined. Independence of theorems such as the law of excluded middle are here given model-theoretically (in later chapters, these are also presented proof-theoretically). After presenting classical predicate logic, the systems of classical and intuitionistic arithmetic are presented. Gentzen’s first substantial result, the so-called Gödel-Gentzen translation, is discussed in the final section where it is proved that if intuitionistic arithmetic is consistent, so is classical arithmetic.

Wilfried Buchholz. Notation systems for infinitary derivations. Archive for mathematical logic, vol. 30 no. 5–6 (1991), pp. 277–296. - Wilfried Buchholz. Explaining Gentzen's consistency proof within infinitary proof theory. Computational logic and proof theory, 5th Kurt Gödel colloquium, KGC '97, Vienna, Austria, August 25–29, 1997, Proceedings, edited by Georg Gottlob, Alexander Leitsch, and Daniele Mundici, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 1289, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc., 1997, pp. 4–17. - Sergei Tupailo. Finitary reductions for local predicativity, I: recursively regular ordinals. Logic Colloquium '98, Proceedings of the annual European summer meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, held in Prague, Czech Republic, August 9–15, 1998, edited by Samuel R. Buss, Petr Háajek, and Pavel Pudlák, Lecture notes in logic, no. 13, Association for Symbolic Logic, Urbana, and A K Peters, Natick, Mass., etc., 2000, pp. 465–499. - Volume 8 Issue 3

Many-valued logics in general and 3-valued logic in particular is an old subject which had its beginning in the work of Łukasiewicz [Łuk]. Recently there is a revived interest in this topic, both for its own sake (see, for example, [Ho]), and also because of its potential applications in several areas of computer science, such as proving correctness of programs [Jo], knowledge bases [CP] and artificial intelligence [Tu]. There are, however, a huge number of 3-valued systems which logicians have studied throughout the years. The motivation behind them and their properties are not always clear, and their proof theory is frequently not well developed. This state of affairs makes both the use of 3-valued logics and doing fruitful research on them rather difficult.Our first goal in this work is, accordingly, to identify and characterize a class of 3-valued logics which might be called natural. For this we use the general framework for characterizing and investigating logics which we have developed in [Av1]. Not many 3-valued logics appear as natural within this framework, but it turns out that those that do include some of the best known ones. These include the 3-valued logics of Łukasiewicz, Kleene and Sobociński, the logic LPF used in the VDM project, the logic RM3 from the relevance family and the paraconsistent 3-valued logic of [dCA]. Our presentation provides justifications for the introduction of certain connectives in these logics which are often regarded as ad hoc. It also shows that they are all closely related to each other. It is shown, for example, that Łukasiewicz 3-valued logic and RM3 (the strongest logic in the family of relevance logics) are in a strong sense dual to each other, and that both are derivable by the same general construction from, respectively, Kleene 3-valued logic and the 3-valued paraconsistent logic.

Dynamic logic is a powerful framework for reasoning about imperative programs. An extension with a concurrent operator, called concurrent propositional dynamic logic (CPDL) [20], was introduced to formalise programs running in parallel. In a different direction, other authors proposed a systematic method for generating multi-valued propositional dynamic logics to reason about weighted programs [15]. This paper presents the first step of combining these two frameworks to introduce uncertainty in concurrent computations. In the proposed framework, a weight is assigned to each branch of the parallel execution, resulting in a (possible) asymmetric parallelism, inherent to the fuzzy programming paradigm [2, 23]. By adopting such an approach, a family of logics is obtained, called multi-valued concurrent propositional dynamic logics (\(\mathcal {GCDL}(\mathbf {A})\)), parametric on an action lattice \(\mathbf {A}\) specifying a notion of “weight” assigned to program execution. Additionally, the validity of some axioms of CPDL is discussed in the new family of generated logics.

We present Classical BI (CBI), a new addition to the family of bunched logics which originates in O'Hearn and Pym's logic of bunched implications BI. CBI differs from existing bunched logics in that its multiplicative connectives behave classically rather than intuitionistically (including in particular a multiplicative version of classical negation). At the semantic level, CBI-formulas have the normal bunched logic reading as declarative statements about resources, but its resource models necessarily feature more structure than those for other bunched logics; principally, they satisfy the requirement that every resource has a unique dual. At the proof-theoretic level, a very natural formalism for CBI is provided by a display calculus \`a la Belnap, which can be seen as a generalisation of the bunched sequent calculus for BI. In this paper we formulate the aforementioned model theory and proof theory for CBI, and prove some fundamental results about the logic, most notably completeness of the proof theory with respect to the semantics.

We study the complexity of query satisfiability and entailment for the Boolean information retrieval models WP and AWV using techniques from propositional logic and computational complexity. WP and AWV can be used to represent and query textual information under the Boolean model using the concept of attribute with values of type text, the concept of word, and word proximity constraints. Variations of WP and AWP are in use in most deployed digital libraries using the Boolean model, text extenders for relational database systems (e.g., Oracle 10g), search engines, and P2P systems for information retrieval and filtering

Minimally Unsatisfiable Subformulas (MUS) find a wide range of practical applications, including product configuration, knowledge-based validation, and hardware and software design and verification. MUSes also find application in recent Maximum Satisfiability algorithms and in CNF formula redundancy removal. Besides direct applications in Propositional Logic, algorithms for MUS extraction have been applied to more expressive logics. This paper proposes two algorithms for computation of MUSes of propositional formulas in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF). The first algorithm is optimal in its class, meaning that it requires the smallest number of calls to a SAT solver. The second algorithm extends earlier work, but implements a number of new techniques. Among these, this paper analyzes in detail the technique of recursive model rotation, which provides significant performance gains in practice. Experimental results, obtained on representative practical benchmarks, indicate that the new algorithms achieve significant performance gains with respect to state of the art MUS extraction algorithms.

Resolution-based Theorem Proving for Many-valued Logics

Algebra, Proof Theory and Applications for a Logic of Propositions, Actions and Adjoint Modal Operators

The aim of this paper is to study a family of logics that approximates classical inference, in which every step in the approximation can be decided in polynomial time. For clausal logic, this task has been shown to be possible by Dalal [4,5]. However, Dalal’s approach cannot be applied to full classical logic. In this paper we provide a family of logics, called Limited Bivaluation Logics, via a semantic approach to approximation that applies to full classical logic. Two approximation families are built on it. One is parametric and can be used in a depth-first approximation of classical logic. The other follows Dalal’s spirit, and with a different technique we show that it performs at least as well as Dalal’s polynomial approach over clausal logic.

Normal forms for fuzzy logic functions and their approximation ability

We design a proof system for propositional classical logic that integrates two languages for Boolean functions: standard conjunction-disjunction-negation and binary decision trees. We give two reasons to do so. The first is proof-theoretical naturalness: The system consists of all and only the inference rules generated by the single, simple, linear scheme of the recently introduced subatomic logic. Thanks to this regularity, cuts are eliminated via a natural construction. The second reason is that the system generates efficient proofs. Indeed, we show that a certain class of tautologies due to Statman, which cannot have better than exponential cut-free proofs in the sequent calculus, have polynomial cut-free proofs in our system. We achieve this by using the same construction that we use for cut elimination. In summary, by expanding the language of propositional logic, we make its proof theory more regular and generate more proofs, some of which are very efficient. That design is made possible by considering atoms as superpositions of their truth values, which are connected by self-dual, non-commutative connectives. A proof can then be projected via each atom into two proofs, one for each truth value, without a need for cuts. Those projections are semantically natural and are at the heart of the constructions in this article. To accommodate self-dual non-commutativity, we compose proofs in deep inference.

This paper characterizes the admissible rules for six interesting intuitionistic modal logics: iCK4, iCS4≡IPC, strong Löb logic iSL, modalized Heyting calculus mHC, Kuznetsov-Muravitsky logic KM, and propositional lax logic PLL. Admissible rules are rules that can be added to a logic without changing the set of theorems of the logic. We provide a Gentzen-style proof theory for admissibility that combines methods known for intuitionistic propositional logic and classical modal logic. From this proof theory, we extract bases for the admissible rules, i.e., sets of admissible rules that derive all other admissible rules. In addition, we show that admissibility is decidable for these logics.

Substitution Frege and extended Frege proof systems in non-classical logics