Tree Languages Defined in First-Order Logic with One Quantifier Alternation

We present effective criteria for first-order definability of regular tree languages. It is known that over words the absence of modulo counting (the “noncounting property”) characterizes the expressive power of first-order logic (McNaughton, Schutzenberger), whereas non-counting regular tree languages exist which are not first-order definable. We present new conditions on regular tree languages (more precisely, on tree automata) which imply nondefinability in first-order logic. One method is based on tree homomorphisms which allow to deduce nondefinability of one tree language from nondefinability of another tree language. Additionly we introduce a structural property of tree automata (the socalled Λ-∨-patterns) which also causes tree languages to be undefinable in first-order logic. Finally, it is shown that this notion does not yet give a complete characterization of first-order logic over trees. The proofs rely on the method of Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse games.

Liveness properties are traditionally proven using a ranking function that maps system states to some well-founded set. Carrying out such proofs in first-order logic enables automation by SMT solvers. However, reasoning about many natural ranking functions is beyond reach of existing solvers. To address this, we introduce the notion of implicit rankings — first-order formulas that soundly approximate the reduction of some ranking function without defining it explicitly. We provide recursive constructors of implicit rankings that can be instantiated and composed to induce a rich family of implicit rankings. Our constructors use quantifiers to approximate reasoning about useful primitives such as cardinalities of sets and unbounded sums that are not directly expressible in first-order logic. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our implicit rankings by verifying liveness properties of several intricate examples, including Dijkstra’s k-state, 4-state and 3-state self-stabilizing protocols.

Closure properties of linear context-free tree languages with an application to optimality theory

The elimination distance to some target graph property P is a general graph modification parameter introduced by Bulian and Dawar. We initiate the study of elimination distances to graph properties expressible in first-order logic. We delimit the problem’s fixed-parameter tractability by identifying sufficient and necessary conditions on the structure of prefixes of first-order logic formulas. Our main result is the following meta-theorem: For every graph property P expressible by a first order-logic formula \( \varphi \in \Sigma _3 \) , that is, of the form \( \begin{equation*} \varphi =\exists x_1\exists x_2\cdots \exists x_r\ \ \forall y_{1}\forall y_{2}\cdots \forall y_{s}\ \ \exists z_1\exists z_2\cdots \exists z_t~~ \psi ,\end{equation*} \) where \( \psi \) is a quantifier-free first-order formula, checking whether the elimination distance of a graph to P does not exceed \( k \) , is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by \( k \) . Properties of graphs expressible by formulas from \( \Sigma _3 \) include being of bounded degree, excluding a forbidden subgraph, or containing a bounded dominating set. We complement this theorem by showing that such a general statement does not hold for formulas with even slightly more expressive prefix structure: There are formulas \( \varphi \in \Pi _3 \) , for which computing elimination distance is \( {\sf W}[2] \) -hard.

We study property testing of properties that are definable in first-order logic (FO) in the bounded-degree graph and relational structure models. We show that any FO property that is defined by a formula with quantifier prefix ∃∗∀∗ is testable (i.e., testable with constant query complexity), while there exists an FO property that is expressible by a formula with quantifier prefix ∀∗∃∗ that is not testable. In the dense graph model, a similar picture is long known (Alon, Fischer, Krivelevich, Szegedy, Combinatorica 2000), despite the very different nature of the two models. In particular, we obtain our lower bound by a first-order formula that defines a class of bounded-degree expanders, based on zig-zag products of graphs. We expect this to be of independent interest. We then prove testability of some first-order properties that speak about isomorphism types of neighbourhoods, including testability of 1-neighbourhood-freeness, and r-neighbourhood-freeness under a mild assumption on the degrees.

A successor-invariant first-order formula is a formula that has access to an\nauxiliary successor relation on a structure's universe, but the model relation\nis independent of the particular interpretation of this relation. It is well\nknown that successor-invariant formulas are more expressive on finite\nstructures than plain first-order formulas without a successor relation. This\nnaturally raises the question whether this increase in expressive power comes\nat an extra cost to solve the model-checking problem, that is, the problem to\ndecide whether a given structure together with some (and hence every) successor\nrelation is a model of a given formula. It was shown earlier that adding\nsuccessor-invariance to first-order logic essentially comes at no extra cost\nfor the model-checking problem on classes of finite structures whose underlying\nGaifman graph is planar [Engelmann et al., 2012], excludes a fixed minor\n[Eickmeyer et al., 2013] or a fixed topological minor [Eickmeyer and\nKawarabayashi, 2016; Kreutzer et al., 2016]. In this work we show that the\nmodel-checking problem for successor-invariant formulas is fixed-parameter\ntractable on any class of finite structures whose underlying Gaifman graphs\nform a class of bounded expansion. Our result generalises all earlier results\nand comes close to the best tractability results on nowhere dense classes of\ngraphs currently known for plain first-order logic.\n

A successor-invariant first-order formula is a formula that has access to an auxiliary successor relation on a structure's universe, but the model relation is independent of the particular interpretation of this relation. It is well known that successor-invariant formulas are more expressive on finite structures than plain first-order formulas without a successor relation. This naturally raises the question whether this increase in expressive power comes at an extra cost to solve the model-checking problem, that is, the problem to decide whether a given structure together with some (and hence every) successor relation is a model of a given formula. It was shown earlier that adding successor-invariance to first-order logic essentially comes at no extra cost for the model-checking problem on classes of finite structures whose underlying Gaifman graph is planar [1], excludes a fixed minor [2] or a fixed topological minor [3], [4]. In this work we show that the model-checking problem for successor-invariant formulas is fixed-parameter tractable on any class of finite structures whose underlying Gaifman graphs form a class of bounded expansion. Our result generalises all earlier results and comes close to the best tractability results on nowhere dense classes of graphs currently known for plain first-order logic.

Traditionally, data that has both linear and hierarchical structure, such as annotated linguistic data, is modeled using ordered trees and queried using tree automata. In this paper, we argue that nested words and automata over nested words offer a better way to capture and process the dual structure. Nested words generalize both words and ordered trees, and allow both word and tree operations. We study various classes of automata over nested words, and show that while they enjoy expressiveness and succinctness benefits over word and tree automata, their analysis complexity and closure properties are analogous to the corresponding word and tree special cases. In particular, we show that finite-state nested word automata can be exponentially more succinct than tree automata, and pushdown nested word automata include the two incomparable classes of context-free word languages and context-free tree languages.

Over the last decades the theory of finite automata on infinite objects has been an important source of tools for the specification and the verification of computer programs. Trees are more suitable than words to model nondeterminism and thus concurrency. In the literature, there are several examples of acceptance conditions that have been proposed for automata on infinite words and then have been fruitfully extended to infinite trees (Buchi, Rabin, and Muller conditions). The type of acceptance condition can influence both the succinctness of the corresponding class of automata and the complexity of the related decision problems. Here we consider, for automata on infinite trees, two acceptance conditions that are obtained by a relaxation of the Muller acceptance condition: the Landweber and the Muller-Superset conditions. We prove that Muller-Superset tree automata accept the same class of languages as Buchi tree automata, but using more succinct automata. Landweber tree automata, instead, define a class of languages which is not comparable with the one defined by Buchi tree automata. We prove that, for this class of automata, the emptiness problem is decidable in polynomial time, and thus we expand the class of automata with a tractable emptiness problem.

We consider the problem of checking whether a proposed invariant \(\varphi \) expressed in first-order logic with quantifier alternation is inductive, i.e. preserved by a piece of code. While the problem is undecidable, modern SMT solvers can sometimes solve it automatically. However they employ powerful quantifier instantiation methods that may diverge, especially when \(\varphi \) is not preserved. A notable difficulty arises due to counterexamples of infinite size.

We present the first polynomial time algorithm to learn nontrivial classes of languages of infinite trees. Specifically, our algorithm uses membership and equivalence queries to learn classes of omega-tree languages derived from weak regular omega-word languages in polynomial time. The method is a general polynomial time reduction of learning a class of derived omega-tree languages to learning the underlying class of omega-word languages, for any class of omega-word languages recognized by a deterministic Büchi acceptor. Our reduction, combined with the polynomial time learning algorithm of Maler and Pnueli [Maler and Pneuli, Inform. Comput., 1995] for the class of weak regular omega-word languages yields the main result. We also show that subset queries that return counterexamples can be implemented in polynomial time using subset queries that return no counterexamples for deterministic or non-deterministic finite word acceptors, and deterministic or non-deterministic Büchi omega-word acceptors. A previous claim of an algorithm to learn regular omega-trees due to Jayasrirani, Begam and Thomas [Jayasrirani et al., ICGI, 2008] is unfortunately incorrect, as shown in [Angluin, YALEU/DCS/TR-1528, 2016].

Motivated by applications in software verification, we explore automated reasoning about the non-disjoint combination of theories of infinitely many finite structures, where the theories share set variables and set operations. We prove a combination theorem and apply it to show the decidability of the satisfiability problem for a class of formulas obtained by applying propositional connectives to formulas belonging to: 1) Boolean Algebra with Presburger Arithmetic (with quantifiers over sets and integers), 2) weak monadic second-order logic over trees (with monadic second-order quantifiers), 3) two-variable logic with counting quantifiers (ranging over elements), 4) the Bernays-Schonfinkel-Ramsey class of first-order logic with equality (with ∃*¬* quantifier prefix), and 5) the quantifier-free logic of multisets with cardinality constraints.

Tree-walking automata (TWAs) recently received new attention in the fields of formal languages and databases. Towards a better understanding of their expressiveness, we characterize them in terms of transitive closure logic formulas in normal form. It is conjectured by Engelfriet and Hoogeboom that TWAs cannot define all regular tree languages, or equivalently, all of monadic second-order logic. We prove this conjecture for a restricted, but powerful, class of TWAs. In particular, we show that 1-bounded TWAs, that is TWAs that are only allowed to traverse every edge of the input tree at most once in every direction, cannot define all regular languages. We then extend this result to a class of TWAs that can simulate first-order logic (FO) and is capable of expressing properties not definable in FO extended with regular path expressions; the latter logic being a valid abstraction of current query languages for XML and semi-structured data.Keywordsautomatalogicregular tree languages

We study the problem of learning regular tree languages from text. We show that the framework of function distinguishability as introduced in our ALT 2000 paper is generalizable from the case of string languages towards tree languages, hence providing a large source of identifiable classes of regular tree languages. Each of these classes can be characterized in various ways. Moreover, we present a generic inference algorithm with polynomial update time and prove its correctness. In this way, we generalize previous works of Angluin, Sakakibara and ourselves. Moreover, we show that this way all regular tree languages can be identified approximately.

Regular tree expressions are a formalism for describing regular tree languages, which can be accepted by a finite tree automaton as a standard model of computation. It was proved that the class of regular tree languages is a proper subclass of tree languages whose linear notations can be accepted by deterministic string pushdown automata. In this paper, we present a new algorithm for transforming regular tree expressions to equivalent real-time height-deterministic pushdown automata that accept the trees in their postfix notation.