Electrochemical Investigation of Co- and CO2-Electrolysis on Planar Industrial Sized Fuel Electrode-Supported Cell
In order to address the issue of the anthropogenic greenhouse effect, the supply with renewable energy will play a major role in the future energy systems. A particularly promising approach to store or even use renewable energy in sectors where electricity cannot be used effectively yet (for example in aviation) are synthetic fuels. Within the synthetic fuel generation process, known as Power-to-X, syngas (H2+CO) can be synthesized into liquid hydrocarbons, such as gasoline or jet fuel, via the Fischer-Tropsch process. In comparison with alternative processes, such as a steam electrolyzer in combination with a reverse water gas shift reactor, solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) offer great potential for producing the required syngas in a single, less complex, and more efficient step within Power-to-X utilizing only steam (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and electricity from renewable sources.This so-called co-electrolysis, which involves the simultaneous reduction of H2O and CO2 in SOECs, is of particular importance. It enables direct and efficient syngas production with a tailored H2/CO ratio, thereby reducing the need for additional downstream processing steps. This integrated approach enhances overall system efficiency, minimizes energy losses, and supports carbon utilization efforts, making it a crucial technology for sustainable fuel and chemical production. However, different syngas applications and associated SOE operating conditions can cause performance deterioration of SOECs. Consequently, a comprehensive understanding of losses incurred by diverse inlet mixtures, in conjunction with other operational conditions, such as temperature or the total flow rate, during electrolysis is essential.To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is currently a lack of literature on operating cells with CO at the inlet, especially in CO2-electrolysis, where H2 is often added to avoid oxidation of Nickel in the fuel electrode. In order to investigate the influence of different gas components (H2O, H2, CO2, CO) of inlet compositions on performance and losses of SOECs, a series of experiments was performed on a commercial fuel electrode-supported cell with an active area of 81 cm2. To maintain a total flow rate of 2.2 slpm nitrogen was added, and the amount of H2O, H2, CO2, CO was varied, depending on the desired mixture. It is noteworthy that the air flow rate applied to the air electrode remained constant at 2.2 slpm throughout the experimental series. Initially, H2O electrolysis was conducted as a reference, followed by various mixtures for co-electrolysis and CO2 electrolysis, each with distinct H2O/CO2-, H2/CO-, and product/reactant-ratios. In the final experiment, pure CO2 was utilized as the feedstock for CO2-electrolysis, aiming to determine the losses in electrolysis in the absence of product species (CO).During the experiments polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in 50 mA/cm2 steps were used for characterizing the performance of the cell at current densities up to 350 mA/cm2. The monitoring of the temperature distribution over the active area was realized through thermocouples integrated in the cell-housing near the gas flow channels on both the anode and cathode side. This approach enables further analysis of the reaction mechanism over the cell area, correlation of impedance data with thermal effects, and detection of hotspots. The outlet gas composition was monitored via a gas analyzer to determine the dry composition.This study investigates the impact of gas components at the inlet in co- and CO2-electrolysis on the performance of fuel electrode-supported SOECs, emphasizing losses in specific operating conditions. Furthermore, it offers a distinctive perspective on CO2 electrolysis with pure CO2 in an industrially sized cell, emphasizing substantial losses with no products at the inlet. The results show that the resistance in co-electrolysis is close to H2O-electolysis and way lower than in CO2-electrolysis which indicates that the main electrochemical reaction is the H2O-electolysis and CO2 is mostly converted to CO via the reverse water gas shift reaction. Figure 1
Read more