The incidence and potentially different biological impact of naturally acquired maternal and fetal cells were enthusiastically and extensively discussed when basic scientists and clinicians met at the Medical University of Graz in Austria for an International Symposium on Chimerism (Fig. 1). The two day program featured presentations by speakers from 4 different continents, intermingled with short presentations focusing on technical aspects of chimerism analysis by representatives from the companies who sponsored the meeting. Details on the program and speakers list are available at the meeting’s website (http://chimerism.medunigraz.at/cms/website.php). As also exemplified by the various different types of studies published in the recently released journal Chimerism, this field is slowly but steadily expanding as new research teams working outside and within the transplantation field have become interested in the biologically intriguing phenomena of chimerism and microchimerism (Mc). The highlights of the meeting are summarized in this meeting report. Figure 1. The Symposium on Chimerism. Photo courtesy of Harry Schiffer, Copyright Graz Tourism. Technical Aspects of Chimerism Analysis Since the 1979 paper by Herzenberg and colleagues reporting enrichment of cells from pregnant women presumed to be fetal using flow-sorting techniques,1 many different studies have been published describing fetal or maternal cells in diverse hematopoietic cell types or tissues and organs. During the past decade, major technical improvements regarding the detection of these generally rare cells have been made. This has resulted in a shift from the more traditional XY fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) staining technique applied to tissue sections to more refined technologies such as real-time PCR for the detection of male-specific DNA sequences in genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood cells or processed tissues. Real-time PCR reactions for mismatched HLA alleles as well as for other genetic markers (insertion/deletion) have been developed in the laboratories of meeting participants Dr Nelson (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA), Dr Lambert (INSERM UMRs 1097, Marseille, France) and Dr van Halteren (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands). Unfortunately, many researchers are faced by the problem that this approach requires the availability of DNA from mother or offspring in order to find informative genetic markers. Of note, the newly developed QuantiChimera platform established at the laboratory of Dr Lambert can be contacted for technical support regarding state-of-the art PCR technology for Mc detection. Particularly relevant for investigators who are restricted to using FISH techniques for the identification of rare maternal or fetal chimeric cells is the collective observation that this technique does not always give consistent staining results. This may be explained by the fact that archived tissue samples are often subjected to different fixation protocols. As discussed by Dr Sedlmayr and Dr Kroneis (Medical University, Graz, Austria), FISH by itself is a less than optimal technique for the analysis of rare microchimeric cells given the frequency of false positive cells. This issue can in part be addressed by using two reverse sets of differently labeled X and Y probes. Also biochemical markers such as unique cell surface molecules or markers that can be used to distinguish fetal cells from adult cells are not perfectly reliable in the setting of analysis of extremely rare cells. Unambiguous identification of individual microchimeric cells can be done by combining either FISH analysis or analysis of biochemical markers with DNA genotyping of candidate cells isolated by laser microdissection.2 The introduction of a whole genome amplification step subsequently even allows combining DNA genotyping of single microchimeric cells with sequencing or comparative genome hybridization.3This exciting new approach is expected to further boost the chimerism field.
Read more