Dysphagia is common among older adults and frequently necessitates the use of thickening agents to facilitate safe swallowing of medicines, which may in turn alter their bioavailability. This study investigated the impact of two commercially available lubricants—Gloup® Forte and extremely thick water—on the in vitro dissolution behaviour of immediate-release gliclazide tablets. Dissolution studies were conducted using crushed and whole tablets in different media consisting of reverse osmosis water, phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and 0.1 N HCl at 37 °C. Dissolution profiles were compared using similarity factor (f2) analysis and modelled using established kinetic equations. Gliclazide dissolution was significantly delayed in the presence of Gloup® Forte across all media for both crushed and whole tablets, with f2 values below 50, indicating dissimilar profiles. Dissolution kinetics confirmed that mixing the formulated gliclazide with Gloup® Forte delayed the release and reduced the dissolution rate constant for drug from both crushed and whole gliclazide tablets in media studied.

Exercise-induced myokines have emerged as crucial mediators of the beneficial effects of physical activity on neurodegenerative diseases through complex molecular mechanisms involving oxidative stress reduction, neuroinflammation suppression, and synaptic plasticity enhancement. Among these myokines, irisin, encoded by the FNDC5 gene, has gained significant attention as a potential therapeutic target in neurodegenerative conditions due to its ability to cross the blood–brain barrier and exert pleiotropic neuroprotective effects. This review synthesizes current evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies examining the role of exercise-induced irisin in neurodegeneration, with particular emphasis on translational potential and therapeutic applications. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases (spanning January 2015 to December 2024) to identify peer-reviewed articles investigating irisin’s neuroprotective mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria (five rodent/primate model studies and five human clinical investigations), which were analyzed for methodological rigor, intervention protocols, biomarker quantification methods, and reported outcomes. Reviewed studies consistently demonstrated that exercise-induced endogenous irisin elevation correlates with improved cognitive function, reduced neuroinflammatory markers, enhanced synaptic plasticity, and modulation of neurodegenerative pathways, with exogenous irisin administration reproducing several neuroprotective benefits observed with exercise training in animal models. However, substantial heterogeneity exists regarding exercise prescription parameters (intensity, duration, frequency, modality), training-induced irisin quantification methodologies (ELISA versus mass spectrometry), and study designs (ranging from uncontrolled human observations to randomized controlled trials in animal models). Critical appraisal reveals that human studies lack adequate control for confounding variables including baseline physical fitness, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and potential sources of bias, while biochemical studies indicate distinct pharmacokinetics between endogenous training-induced irisin and exogenous bolus dosing, necessitating careful interpretation of therapeutic applicability. The translational potential of irisin as a therapeutic agent or drug target depends on resolving methodological standardization in biomarker measurement, conducting well-designed clinical trials with rigorous control for confounders, and integrating findings from molecular/biochemical studies to elucidate mechanisms linking irisin to disease modification. Future research should prioritize establishing clinical trial frameworks that harmonize exercise prescriptions, employ robust biomarker quantification (mass spectrometry), and stratify participants based on disease stage, comorbidities, and genetic predisposition to clarify irisin’s role as a potential therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disease management.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly contributed to advancements in pharmaceutical practice, particularly by enhancing the pharmacist–patient relationship and improving medication adherence. This quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study investigated Eastern Romanian pharmacists’ perception of AI-based applications as effective optimization tools, correlating it with disruptive communication factors. An anonymous and online questionnaire was distributed to community pharmacists, examining sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of disruptive factors, and the perceived usefulness of AI. The sample included 437 respondents: pharmacists (55.6%), mostly female (83.8%), and aged between 25 and 44 (52.6%). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and independent t-tests. The statistical analysis revealed a significantly positive perception (p < 0.001) of AI on pharmacist–patient communication. Respondents viewed AI as a valuable tool for reducing medication errors and optimizing counseling time, though they maintain a strong emphasis on genuine human interaction. Significant correlations were found between disruptive factors—such as noise and high patient volume—and the quality of communication. Participants also expressed an increased interest in applications like automatic prescription scheduling and the use of chatbots. The study concludes that a balanced implementation of AI technologies is necessary, one that runs parallel with the continuous development of pharmacists’ communication skills. Future research should focus on validating AI’s impact on clinical outcomes and establishing clear ethical guidelines regarding the use of patient data.

Background: Pediatric patients often receive medicines manipulated from adult formulations due to a lack of age-appropriate products. While such practices are clinically routine, they may reflect deeper systemic deficiencies in pediatric pharmacotherapy. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the prevalence, definitions, and types of pediatric drug manipulation and to conceptualize manipulation as an indicator of structural gaps in formulation science, regulation, and access. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed (January 2014–July 2024) included 10 studies reporting the frequency of drug manipulation in children aged ≤18 years. Eligible studies were synthesized narratively according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Ten studies from nine countries were included, reporting manipulation frequencies ranging from 6.4% to 62% of all drug administrations and up to 60% at the patient level. Manipulated formulations most commonly included oral solid doses, altered through dispersing, splitting, or crushing. Definitions and methodologies varied considerably. The findings revealed five recurring structural gaps: limited pediatric formulations, inconsistent regulatory implementation, lack of standardized definitions and guidance, insufficient evidence on manipulation safety, and inequitable access across regions. Conclusion: Manipulation of finished dosage forms for use in children is a widespread, measurable phenomenon reflecting systemic inadequacies in formulation development, regulation, and access. Recognizing manipulation as a structural indicator may guide policy, innovation, and equitable pediatric pharmacotherapy worldwide.

Introduction: During pharmaceutical care, community pharmacists play a crucial role by carrying out interventions aimed at preventing, detecting, and resolving drug-related problems (DRPs) and negative outcomes associated with medication (NOM), simultaneously enhancing patients’ knowledge about their treatments. The chronic use of Benzodiazepines (BZDs) is known to be associated with risks such as tolerance, dependence, and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, the combined use of BZDs with other medications or alcohol may expose patients to significant drug interactions. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize and describe the clinical profile of patients using BZDs, to evaluate the extent of polypharmacy and potential drug interactions, to investigate their level of knowledge regarding BZD treatment, and ultimately, to propose evidence-based interventions from the community pharmacy to contribute to improving patient safety and minimizing risks associated with BZD use. Method: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted in a single community pharmacy in Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). The study population comprised 125 adult patients with active BZD prescriptions. Data collection was performed through pharmacist–patient structured interviews using a questionnaire that included sociodemographic, clinical, and BZD knowledge variables. Results: Lormetazepam and alprazolam were the BZDs most frequently prescribed and dispensed. Potential drug interactions with other medications were detected in 38.4% of BZD users. Notably, 61.5% of patients using BZDs also reported the concurrent use of opioid analgesics, with tramadol being the most common opioid (48.1% of BZD users were also treated with tramadol). Statistically significant differences were observed between patients with and without BZD and other drug interactions in several adverse outcome variables, including the risk of falls (p = 0.003), cognitive impairment (p = 0.047), and urinary incontinence (p = 0.016). Existing BZD dependence is detected in 25% and 22.1% of cases, respectively. Patients’ knowledge of their BZD treatment revealed critical gaps, which are identified as a challenge and a clear opportunity for intervention through pharmaceutical care services. Conclusions: The findings underscore the essential and proactive role of community pharmacists in identifying and managing drug interactions, as well as in supporting deprescribing strategies through collaborative and interprofessional care models.

Frailty among older adults heightens their risk of negative health outcomes, and medication use plays a major role in this increased vulnerability. Various aspects of medication use elevate the risk of poor outcomes in individuals with frailty. The current scoping review was designed to explore medication use in older adults with frailty in primary care, focusing on the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), polypharmacy, medication adherence, and their role in contributing to adverse drug events. This scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley, supplemented by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A search of the literature was conducted from inception to November 2023 in Ovid EMBASE, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Ovid International Pharmaceutical s. Studies which met the eligibility criteria included older adults with frailty (≥65 years) living at home, defined frailty criteria, and assessment of medication use. Out of the 4726 studies screened, 223 were included, conducted across 39 countries. Frailty prevalence varied widely from 0.9% to 89.2%. Polypharmacy (5–9 medications) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 medications) were notably more common among individuals with frailty, with polypharmacy rates ranging from 1.3% to 96.4%. Twelve studies reported PIM prevalence among individuals with varying levels of frailty, ranging from 2.4% to 95.9%. This scoping review highlights the challenges and complexities involved in understanding the relationship between medication use and frailty in older adults.

Chemotherapy for breast cancer includes pertuzumab and trastuzumab regimens with docetaxel (PHD) or paclitaxel (PHP). Current approaches for using supportive care drugs to manage the side effects of PHD and PHP are unclear. Here, we investigated the occurrence of side effects before and after supportive care medications were modified by discontinuing antipyretic analgesics. We retrospectively analyzed adverse events that occurred within 24 h of treating 76 patients with PHD or PHP. The frequencies of adverse effects in the groups before and after modification did not differ significantly (45.5% [15/33] and 44.2% [19/43], respectively). Severity also did not significantly differ between the groups. Therefore, discontinuing antipyretic analgesics as supportive care drugs had little effect on the frequency of side effects. Symptoms of feeling hot, pyrexic, and flushed were frequent, and their severity increased in the group after the support drugs were modified. Discontinuation of supportive care medications, including antipyretic analgesics, might affect the severity of certain symptoms and lead to the development of side effects that require medical intervention. Overall, our findings indicate the need to consider premedication with antipyretic analgesics, including further analysis of the risk factors that can predict symptoms.

(1) Background: Pharmacist interventions are key to optimizing medication therapy and improving patient outcomes. The CLEO multidimensional tool assesses the clinical, economic, and organizational impact of these interventions, though its use in Portuguese hospital settings is limited. This study explored the predicted impact of pharmacist interventions in the Oncology Department of a Portuguese hospital, using CLEO to quantify their potential contribution to patient care and healthcare system efficiency;(2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the hospital’s Oncology Outpatient Pharmacy between April and December 2024. Data from 144 pharmacist interventions were analyzed, focusing on drug-related problems, corrective actions, and CLEO scores. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis; (3) Results: The most frequent drug-related problems were incorrect administration frequency (57.6%), drug interactions (22.2%), and incorrect dosing (10.4%). Nearly half of the interventions (47.2%) resulted in prescription corrections. CLEO analysis demonstrated a predicted positive clinical impact (80% of interventions scored 1C–3C), potential economic benefits (40.3% scored 1E), and organizational improvements (79.9% scored 1O), especially in lung, breast, and colorectal cancer treatments; (4) Conclusions: Pharmacist interventions were predicted to be associated with improvements in clinical, economic, and organizational outcomes in oncology care. These findings suggest that systematic documentation and evaluation of interventions using CLEO may enhance patient safety and healthcare efficiency, although further multicenter and prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Radical prostatectomy is the standard of care for the treatment of early, clinically localized prostate cancer (PC). In addition to known clinical prognosticators, perioperative conditions and the type of anesthesia may affect clinical outcomes through several mechanisms that favor a tumor-propagating state, including activation of the sympathetic system, increased opioid requirements, and inflammation. In this review, we provide an overview of the impact of the perioperative period on PC prognosis and patient outcomes. A non-systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the possible association between neuraxial anesthesia and outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. The following keywords were used: “cancer recurrence” OR “cancer prognosis” OR “metastasis” AND “neuraxial anesthesia” AND “prostate cancer”. Eligible studies were summarized in the form of a narrative review. In the era of limited use of ERAS protocols, the implementation of neuraxial anesthesia was found to reduce mortality after RP for primary prostate cancer when compared to general anesthesia. Although there was no significant association between anesthetic technique and radiological or biochemical-free survival, regional anesthesia may have an impact on short-term survival in patients with severe comorbidities, involving pulmonary complications and thrombosis. The effect of anesthetic technique on PC patient outcomes remains elusive, although preliminary retrospective evidence suggests a possible positive effect of neuraxial anesthesia on patient outcomes. As the perioperative period is considered a vulnerable timeframe for these patients, the role of the leadership dyad of surgeon and onco-anesthesiologist is crucial.

Preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) remain a significant threat in community settings, a challenge that is critical in community pharmacy settings where continuity of care and healthcare access can be limited. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of 13 community pharmacists through focus groups and interviews to identify barriers and propose solutions to enhance their role in patient care. Pharmacists emphasized their critical position in ensuring safe medication use, particularly for older adults managing multiple chronic conditions. Key findings revealed five themes: (1) defining medication safety as minimizing risk and empowering patients; (2) characteristics of the “perfect patient,” including medication awareness and proactive engagement; (3) the pharmacist’s role in detecting and resolving medication-related problems; (4) systemic barriers such as time constraints, lack of access to patient records, insufficient privacy, and undervaluation of pharmacists’ roles; and (5) proposed solutions including private counseling areas, increased staffing, integrated electronic health records, and legislative recognition of pharmacists as healthcare providers. Strengthening collaboration with physicians and empowering patients through education were also highlighted as key strategies. These findings underscore the need for systemic changes—especially in light of lessons learned during the pandemic—to support pharmacists in delivering comprehensive medication management and improving patient safety.