- Research Article
- 10.1523/eneuro.0417-25.2026
Learning and motivation state fluctuations from motoric and neurophysiologic metrics during a somatosensory task in mice.
- May 15, 2026
- eNeuro
- Lezio S Bueno-Junior + 3 more +3
Animal learning can be analyzed on two timescales: task acquisition across training sessions and motivation fluctuations within training sessions. How do variations in motor and neurophysiologic activity relate to task performance over these timescales? Here, this question was examined in head-fixed mice performing a whisker-based sensory discrimination task. Male mice were trained for 12-14 daily sessions on a go/no-go task, each lasting approximately one hour to capture spontaneous performance fluctuations over minutes. Simultaneous to task performance, "non-performance variables" were tracked, including wheel running, pupil size, eyelid aperture and sensory cortical activity. First, motivation states were defined based on performance tendencies over minutes, leading to three state categories: persistent, disengaged, or attentive Non-performance variables were found to predict these states independent of task correctness. Then, when further parsing these states by the go/no-go outcomes of hit, miss, false alarm or correct rejection, learning-like changes were detected in wheel running, eye movements and brain activity. Thus, learning over days and motivation fluctuations over minutes form a continuum, as evidenced by changes in motor and physiologic activity variables not directly controlled by task contingencies, even during periods of suboptimal performance in well-trained subjects. These findings improve the understanding of performance variations and implicit learning, in addition to contributing a framework for the analysis of task performance indirectly from motor and neurophysiologic activity.Significance statement Task performance is typically measured by correctness percentages over daily training sessions but can also correlate with motivation state fluctuations within each session. Thus, while aggregating correctness percentages per session may reveal a learning curve, accounting for within-session state fluctuations can reveal variability in that curve, even among well-trained subjects. In this head-fixed mouse study, task acquisition across sessions and motivation fluctuations within sessions were categorized into three states: persistent, disengaged, or attentive Subsequently, metrics not directly controlled by the task, including locomotion, pupil dilation, eyelid aperture and brain activity, were found to predict both learning and state changes. Therefore, task performance can be tracked more comprehensively from brain and body activity metrics, adding nuance to correctness percentages.
Read more