Generative Artificial Intelligence

In today’s evolving world of work, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged not merely as a technological tool but as a catalyst for rethinking how jobs are structured and performed (Bankins et al., 2024; Parker & Grote, 2022). Across diverse job families and organizational contexts, tools like generative AI (GAI) go beyond mere instruments for data analysis or structuring and can adopt increasingly far-reaching roles through rapid progress in generating new graphic or textual content or algorithmic decision making (Ferràs- Hernández, 2018; Walsh et al. 2019). Central to this symposium is the recognition that this changing nature of work due to digitalization, propelled by AI and related tools, calls for a fresh look at established theories of job design and strategies for human resource management. Traditionally, research has illuminated how fostering characteristics like autonomy, skill and task variety, or adequate demands affect employee motivation, satisfaction, and well-being and thereby further organizational outcomes (Oldham & Fried, 2016; Parker et al., 2017). Yet the introduction of AI – particularly generative AI – adds complexity: Who performs which tasks? How are decisions made, and by whom? Which skills remain uniquely human, and which may be augmented or even entirely adopted by AI? Such questions demand a more nuanced and strategic approach to designing work in the future that balances efficiency and innovation with psychological and ethical considerations. The four presentations in this symposium aim to contribute to theory building on how AI affects work in terms of work design, the interplay of employees and AI use, and work outcomes. In particular, they highlight potential risks or unique challenges when working with AI (e.g., in terms of less enriched work, lowered autonomy levels, threats to job identity or risks due to disclosure of use) and path the way for interventions to achieve benefits of such technologies at work. In detail, the empirical studies in this symposium illuminate these issues at three interconnected levels: 1. Task-Level Insights: Two contributions focus on the more granular task characteristics (e.g., autonomy, skill variety) in modern, AI-enhanced work contexts. They demonstrate how AI use influences the allocation of specific tasks when designing work roles and how the perception of task characteristics changes when AI is used in a decision-making task. 2. Job- and Identity-Level: One paper zooms out from individual tasks to jobs as a whole and explores how AI-driven change might disrupt employees’ job identity. This lens demonstrates how task changes cascade into bigger questions of role definition and identity. 3. Organizational Context: Finally, one presentation adopts the broadest perspective and investigates managerial and organizational factors that might shape employees’ willingness to disclose and ethically integrate AI tools. Taken together, these presentations point toward a future in which AI’s transformative potential hinges on thoughtful coordination across tasks, roles, and organizational systems. By combining established frameworks with new insights drawn from (quantitative and qualitative) surveys and experiments conducted in Germany, Austria, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, these contributions illustrate how AI can enrich, rather than diminish, work and thereby strengthen human-centered organizations. By focusing on variables at different levels, the studies path the way for applications in practice, emphasizing the importance of individual approaches (e.g., training for job design, supporting self-efficacy), or on the organizational level (e.g., aligning HR practices, develop clear and supportive organizational policies and guidelines for the use of AI at work). Investigating the Influence of Work Design Perspective and AI Integration on Enriched Job Design Author: Tanja Bipp; Heidelberg University Author: Thea Ebert; Aalen University Collaborative Intelligence: Integrating Generative AI in Knowledge Work and its Impact on Job Design Author: Sabina Hodzic; University of Graz Author: Simon Grob; University of Graz Author: Bettina Kubicek; University of Graz Job Identity as Starting Point for SHRM in AI-Driven Organizational Change Author: Sophie Berretta; Ruhr University Bochum Author: Annette Kluge; Ruhr University Bochum Silent Adoption: Understanding the Drivers of Non-Disclosure of Generative AI Tools by Employees Author: Fangfang Zhang; Curtin University - Perth

Technologically advanced artificial intelligence (AI) is making a significant contribution to strengthening national security. AI algorithms facilitate the processing of vast amounts of information, increasing the speed and accuracy of decision-making. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are crucial for state and integrated hybrid attacks and protecting new threats in cyberspace. Existing AI capabilities have significant potential to impact national security by leveraging existing machine learning technology for automation in labor-intensive activities such as satellite imagery analysis and defense against cyber attacks. This article examines selected aspects of the impact of artificial intelligence on enhancing a state’s ability to protect its interests and its citizens., artificial intelligence through the use of neutron networks, predictive analytics and machine learning algorithms enables security agencies to analyse vast amounts of data and identify patterns indicative of potential threats. Integrating artificial intelligence into surveillance, border control and threat assessment systems enhances the ability to respond preemptively to security challenges. In addition, artificial intelligence algorithms facilitate the processing of vast amounts of information, increasing the speed and accuracy of decision-making by police authorities. The rapid development of AI raises a number of questions for its use in securing not only national security but protecting all citizens. In particular, it is worth answering the question How does artificial intelligence affect national security and clarifying the issue of how law enforcement agencies can use artificial intelligence to maximise the benefits of the new technology in terms of security and protecting communities from rising crime. The analysis is based on a descriptive method in describing the phenomenon; by explaining the concepts and applications of artificial intelligence to determine its role in the national security sphere. An analysis of the usefulness of artificial intelligence in particular in police operations is undertaken, with the aim of defending the thesis that, despite some threats to the protection of human rights from AI, it is becoming the best tool in the fight against all types of crime in the country. Technological advances in AI can also have many positive effects for law enforcement, and useful for law enforcement agencies, for example in facilitating the identification of persons or vehicles, predicting trends in criminal activities, tracking illegal criminal activities or illegal money flows, flagging and responding to fake news. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the biggest threats to information security, but efforts are being made to mitigate this new threat, but also to find solutions on how AI can become an ally in the fight against cyber-security, crime and terrorist threats. Artificial intelligence algorithms search huge datasets of communication traffic, satellite images and social media posts to identify potential cyber security threats, terrorist activities and organized crime. It is advisable, when analyzing the opportunities and threats that AI poses to national and public security, to gain a strategic advantage in the context of rapid technological change and also to manage the many risks associated with AI. The conclusion highlights the impact of AI on national security, creating a range of new opportunities coupled with challenges that government agencies should be prepared for in addressing ethical and security dilemmas. Furthermore, AI improves predictive analytics, thereby enabling security agencies to more accurately anticipate potential threats and enhance their preparedness by identifying vulnerabilities in the national security infrastructure

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI), a specialized branch of artificial intelligence, has developed as a dynamic discipline that drives innovation and creativity across several domains. It is concerned with creating models that can autonomously produce novel text, images, videos, music, 3D, code, and more. GAI is distinguished by its capacity to acquire knowledge from extensive datasets, identify recurring patterns, capture distributions, and produce novel content demonstrating similar features. This review presents a comprehensive historical overview of the development and progression of GAI techniques over the years. Various essential methodologies employed in developing GAI are also discussed, including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), transformers, and diffusion models. Moreover, a detailed overview of the technologies used in GAI is provided for generating images, videos, music, code, and text, such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, Midjourney, Claude, Bard, GitHub Copilot, and others. The research subsequently introduces the different datasets used to train the GAI models and the evaluation metrics for evaluating their performances. Ultimately, the research investigates the diverse applications of GAI across various domains, challenges, and ethical implications.

Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced novel opportunities for the application of AI within the financial sector. This chapter examines the various ways in which generative AI is contributing to the rapidly evolving landscape of finance. While traditional machine learning techniques have long been applied to financial tasks such as customer service, text summarization, risk prediction, algorithmic trading, and document processing, generative AI offers enhanced capabilities aimed at improving operational efficiency, elevating customer experience, and enabling responsible growth. Applications of generative AI in finance now extend to areas including decision-making, risk assessment, portfolio optimization, personalized financial advising, fraud detection, and predictive analytics. The field encompasses a diverse set of models, including generative adversarial networks (GANs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), temporal point processes (TPPs), transformers, and large language models (LLMs). This chapter explores how these models are applied in financial contexts, highlighting both theoretical foundations and practical implementations. A dedicated case study is presented, summarizing recent literature on the use of LLMs in financial tasks, including approaches such as zero-shot and few-shot learning with pretrained models, domain-specific fine-tuning, and training models from the ground up. Finally, the chapter discusses key opportunities and challenges associated with generative AI in FinTech, including the balance between innovation and responsibility, and the need for enhanced interpretability, robustness, and ethical compliance in financial applications, hence aiding towards goals of Industry 5.0.

<sec><title>Objective</title> As urban design faces increasing demands for contextual responsiveness, iterative optimization, and data-informed reasoning, integrating artificial intelligence into the design process has gained renewed relevance. Among emerging technologies, generative artificial intelligence (GAI) shows strong potential for automating content creation and simulating spatial configurations. This research provides a comprehensive review of recent developments in the application of GAI to urban design. The research identifies representative technical pathways, their respective intervention stages, and the functional mechanisms by which generative models are reshaping the design workflow. This research presents a structured, theory-informed synthesis of how different generative models contribute to tasks such as intention modeling, spatial reasoning, and performance-driven design. Building on design thinking and a descriptive lens informed by the technology acceptance model (TAM), the research examines how model type, data modality, and task characteristics affect GAI’s functional role, usability, and acceptance. Particular attention is given to mapping deployment forms, from isolated tools to coordinated multi-model workflows, and to characterizing cross-cutting challenges of controllability, transparency, and contextual adaptability in urban design settings. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> Following the PRISMA protocol, the research conducts a multi-stage literature review combining automated search and expert screening. A total of 125 peer-reviewed articles and high-impact preprints are selected from Web of Science, CNKI, arXiv, and selected industry sources, covering the period from 2014 to July 2025. Search terms such as “generative AI”, “AIGC”, “GAN”, “diffusion model”, “variational autoencoder”, “autoregressive model”, “large language model”, and urban-related keywords are used in various combinations. Based on the collected literature, four types of generative models are summarized as image-driven, language-driven, structure-driven, and feedback-optimized models, according to their application characteristics in urban design tasks. These types are aligned with four stages of the design process: preliminary analysis, scheme generation, evaluation and decision-making, and outcome expression. On this basis, a two-dimensional framework to examine how different GAI pathways intervene across tasks is formed. To refine the mapping, each design stage is further broken down into three representative sub-tasks. Preliminary analysis includes public demand analysis, urban data enhancement, case/task framing, and spatial element recognition. Scheme generation covers design intention modeling, spatial layout generation, and 3D form construction. The evaluation and decision-making stage includes multi-objective optimization, scheme evaluation, and scenario prediction. The final expression stage involves textual documentation, 2D representation, and visual rendering. A quantitative analysis is also conducted to show the distribution of model types over design stages, identify common combinations, and trace the evolution of research focus over time. TAM informs a descriptive synthesis of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) across model types to illuminate adoption patterns. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> The findings reveal that GAI models are increasingly integrated into urban design workflows but exhibit uneven adoption across task types and modalities. Image-driven models dominate in both early-stage analysis and final visual representation due to their high interpretability, usability, and compatibility with existing design practices. Language-driven models are commonly used in public demand analysis, participatory planning, and scenario scripting, enabled by the rise of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek. Structure-driven models, though less prevalent, show promise in generating street networks, land-parcel layouts, and spatial typologies using graph-based logic. Feedback-optimized models, which rely on reinforcement learning, evolutionary algorithms, and performance simulation are the least adopted, but demonstrate strong potential in multi-objective optimization and iterative decision-making. Recent research indicates an increasing use of multi-model workflows, such as text-to-image pipelines integrated with urban simulation or feedback loops. While GAI applications increasingly support design iteration, their adoption is heavily influenced by the controllability, explainability, and contextual adaptability of models. PU and PEU vary significantly by model type, with image-driven models rated highest and structure-driven and feedback-optimized models facing usability challenges due to complexity and low transparency. </sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title> Although GAI has demonstrated broad applicability across the urban design process, current implementations are largely procedural and auxiliary in nature. Most models recombine existing inputs rather than construct original logic, and few possess autonomous reasoning or normative awareness. This limits their role to content augmentation rather than conceptual guidance in design development. Moreover, issues such as opaque decision logic, lack of domain-specific knowledge embedding, and poor adaptability to local planning norms hinder practical adoption. Addressing these challenges requires multi-level efforts: 1) Construct structured, regionally grounded urban design datasets; 2) improve model interpretability, controllability, and responsiveness to professional input; and 3) develop modular, multi-model systems that support seamless interaction across design stages. Human – AI collaboration mechanisms — especially those based on iterative prompts and semantic feedback-must be enhanced to enable AI not just as a tool, but as an active design partner. This review offers a comprehensive reference for scholars and practitioners seeking to understand how GAI is reshaping the logic, structure, and agency of urban design. </sec>

Purpose: This analysis aims to propose guidelines for artificial intelligence (AI) research ethics in scientific publications, intending to inform publishers and academic institutional policies in order to guide them toward a coherent and consistent approach to AI research ethics.Methods: A literature-based thematic analysis was conducted. The study reviewed the publication policies of the top 10 journal publishers addressing the use of AI in scholarly publications as of October 2024. Thematic analysis using Atlas.ti identified themes and subthemes across the documents, which were consolidated into proposed research ethics guidelines for using generative AI and AI-assisted tools in scholarly publications.Results: The analysis revealed inconsistencies among publishers’ policies on AI use in research and publications. AI-assisted tools for grammar and formatting are generally accepted, but positions vary regarding generative AI tools used in pre-writing and research methods. Key themes identified include author accountability, human oversight, recognized and unrecognized uses of AI tools, and the necessity for transparency in disclosing AI usage. All publishers agree that AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Concerns involve biases, quality and reliability issues, compliance with intellectual property rights, and limitations of AI detection tools.Conclusion: The article highlights the significant knowledge gap and inconsistencies in guidelines for AI use in scientific research. There is an urgent need for unified ethical standards, and guidelines are proposed for distinguishing between the accepted use of AI-assisted tools and the cautious use of generative AI tools.

In recent years, the manufacturing industry has undergone transformative changes spurred by the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Generative AI (GenAI). As a subset of AI capable of creating new data from learned patterns, GenAI is poised to reshape manufacturing processes by enhancing productivity, product customization, quality assurance, and operational efficiency. This review synthesizes key findings from scholarly articles published in the first half of 2024, with a primary focus on three GenAI models: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), and Transformer-Based Architectures. The paper critically analyzes the roles and capabilities of GenAI technologies in improving predictive maintenance, supply chain optimization, and sustainable production. It also sheds light on the prevailing challenges and potential future advancements of GenAI integration in industrial environments.

The semiconductor industry plays a vital role in driving technological advancements, and the incorporation of AI (Artificial Intelligence) can greatly enhance its efficiency and productivity. Through optimizing material usage and reducing defects, AI can significantly reduce costs and enhance production efficiency and product quality. However, despite the increasing interest in AI applications in the semiconductor industry, comprehensive reviews are lacking to systematically analyze existing research and identify the challenges and opportunities in this field. This review aims to bridge this gap by providing a thorough overview of AI-driven techniques in optimizing semiconductor manufacturing and offering valuable insights for future research directions. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into chip design marks a transformative phase for the semiconductor industry. Traditional design methodologies, often labor-intensive and time-consuming, are increasingly constrained by human expertise and iterative processes. Generative AI, utilizing advanced machine learning models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), offers innovative approaches to automate and optimize various stages of chip design. This paper examines how generative AI can revolutionize chip design by automating complex tasks, including architecture exploration, circuit optimization, and layout generation. Through case studies, we demonstrate significant improvements in design efficiency, performance optimization, and reduced time-to-market. Additionally, we address challenges such as data availability, model interpretability, and the integration of AI-generated designs into existing verification workflows. The findings highlight the potential of generative AI to enhance design capabilities, reduce development costs, and accelerate innovation in semiconductor technology.

In the dynamic field of programming education, integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools has started to play a significant role in enhancing learning experiences. This paper presents a case study conducted during a foundational programming course for first-year students in higher education, where students were encouraged to utilize generative artificial intelligence programming copilot extensions in their programming IDE and browser-based generative AI tools as supportive AI tools. The primary objective was to observe the impact of AI on the learning curve and the overall educational experience.Key findings suggest that the introduction of AI tools significantly altered the learning experience for students. Many who initially struggled with grasping elementary programming concepts found that AI support made understanding basic programming concepts much easier, enhancing their confidence and skills. This was particularly evident in the reduced levels of anxiety typically associated with early programming learning, as the AI copilot provided a non-judgmental, always-available source for clarifying doubts, including queries that students might hesitate to ask in a traditional classroom setting.Notably, some students leveraged the AI to generate similar exercise problems, reinforcing their understanding and skills. The AI's capability to address basic queries also freed up the instructor's time, allowing for more personalized student guidance in more advanced problems. This shift in the instructional dynamic further contributed to a learning environment where students felt more comfortable engaging with complex topics, thereby reducing the psychological barriers often linked with early-stage programming education.The course's structure, enriched by AI, enabled students to delve into more complex programming constructs earlier than traditional curricula would allow. For instance, students were tasked with simulating basic e-commerce operations, such as user registration, product browsing, and cart functionalities. These practical challenges naturally introduced advanced concepts like external data storage, unit testing, and user interface design, which are typically reserved for more advanced courses. With the help of generative AI programming copilot tools, students at any programming skill level were able to develop nearly functional complex structures. Interestingly, even when their projects were not fully functional, students remained motivated. Instead of feeling discouraged by these imperfect outcomes, they showed resilience and a keen interest in understanding and improving their code. This reaction is a significant shift from traditional learning settings, where unfinished or flawed projects often lead to increased anxiety or a drop in motivation.Furthermore, the AI's proactive suggestions inspired students to explore beyond the curriculum. Advanced learners delved into databases, cryptography libraries in Python, and even more advanced user interface design, ensuring that they remained engaged and challenged. This elementary course, enhanced by generative AI tools, also inspired students to learn other programming languages since they now learned that individual learning is more available with the aid of generative AI.In conclusion, the integration of AI in programming education offers a promising avenue for enhancing both the learning experience and outcomes. This case study underscores the potential of AI to revolutionize traditional teaching methodologies, fostering a more dynamic, responsive, and inclusive learning environment.This paper handles the results, possibilities and challenges of AI empowered education in programming. It also gives practical examples as well as future research perspectives.

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, has generated significant debate within the academic publishing community. This study examines emerging research trends and discussions surrounding the use of generative AI in scientific writing and publishing. Using a bibliometric approach, the study analyses 311 documents indexed in the Scopus database and published between 2023 and 2025. The dataset was processed using the Bibliometrix R package to identify publication trends, frequently used keywords, and thematic relationships. Visualisation techniques, including a word cloud and a keyword co-occurrence network, were employed to map the conceptual structure of the field. The analysis reveals three primary thematic clusters: a technological cluster focused on AI tools and scientific writing, a biomedical-ethical cluster addressing clinical and educational implications, and a publishing-integrity cluster concerned with research ethics, authorship, plagiarism, and peer review. The findings indicate that debates about generative AI in academic publishing are strongly connected to issues of transparency, accountability, and the reliability of scholarly communication. The study highlights the importance of clear editorial policies, responsible AI use, and disclosure practices to maintain research integrity while supporting accessibility and linguistic equity in academic publishing.

This article presents a comprehensive survey on the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in radar applications, with a focus on enhancing radar data processing and system capabilities. Generative AI techniques, particularly Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), are explored for their potential to address persistent challenges in radar technology such as noise management, data augmentation, and target classification. The study investigates how GANs can generate synthetic radar datasets, aiding in model training when actual data is scarce, and how VAEs contribute to signal processing by denoising and reconstructing accurate radar signals. The analysis includes case studies on clutter suppression, radar data augmentation, beam blockage correction, and data fusion, highlighting the transformative impact of Generative AI on radar systems. This paper aims to provide insights into the current advancements and future directions of Generative AI applications in radar, suggesting that these technologies hold significant promise for improving the accuracy and efficiency of radar systems in diverse and dynamic environments.

This study presents results of a systematic literature review (SLR) of the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education, identify patterns of ethical and irresponsible use, and propose a conceptual framework for predicting ethical AI adoption. Following PRISMA guidelines, was conducted on 60 peer-reviewed studies published between 2022 and 2026, sourced from Google Scholar. Studies were mapped against four research questions addressing AI tools used, their applications, reported unethical practices, and predictive modelling approaches. Results reveal that general AI, generative AI tools, and large language models dominate higher education contexts, primarily deployed for personalized learning, academic work, and teaching. Irresponsible practices were documented in one-third of studies, including academic integrity breaches (13.33%), algorithmic bias, and privacy violations. Critically, no existing study developed a real-time predictive model capable of monitoring ethical AI use, despite four studies demonstrating predictive modelling capabilities for other purposes. This study addresses a significant gap by proposing a novel conceptual framework that integrates AI tool deployment, user behaviour, governance measures, and predictive analytics to forecast ethical outcomes. The framework provides higher education institutions with a pathway toward data-informed, proactive governance of AI technologies.

The contemporary scope of nuclear nephrology extends from non-imaging techniques for glomerular filtration rate calculation through dynamic renal scintigraphy and cortical imaging with planar or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) approaches to emerging applications in positron emission tomography (PET) renography and theranostics-based renal toxicity risk assessment. Artificial intelligence (AI) shares a long history with nuclear nephrology that started with expert systems and statistical machine learning (ML) approaches, transitioned through feed forward neural networks (FFNN), landed with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and deep learning (DL), and has emerging opportunities across the gamut of generative AI like large language models (LLMs), diffusion models, generative adversarial networks (GANs) and multimodal models like vision language models (VLMs). A range of AI tools across the nuclear nephrology ecosystem describe bespoke AI algorithms, commercial AI products, embedded AI tools from vendors, general-purpose and cross-domain AI frameworks. Applications in clinical workflow, research and development, and imaging are explored, highlighting the potential of AI in detection, classification, segmentation, prediction, data analysis and image enhancement. Emerging AI opportunities from generative AI, LLMs, VLMs, and segmentation foundation models such as the SAM, offer exciting multi-modal, few-shot learning that may re-imagine nuclear nephrology. There remains the need for considerable development and validation for widespread clinical utility of AI opportunities, and the need for consideration of ethical limitations and social justice.

Among the broad area of artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI algorithms have emerged as a revolutionary technology able to produce highly realistic ‘synthetic’ data, akin to standard simulation but with fewer contraints. The main focus of generative AI has been on phenotypes, but here we argue it can serve as well for generating synthetic environments and genotypes. This data-driven technology may be able to overcome some of the limitations that standard simulations have, such as strong assumptions on the underlying genotype to phenotype map. We discuss key features of popular generative models including autoregressive models, generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, diffusion and flow-based models. Several of these methods utilize a latent space, often of lower dimensionality than the raw data, that can help making the models interpretable and can be a link between simulation and generative algorithms. Augmenting data as realistically as possible with genAI can improve inference and predictive performance of genomic prediction models, but symbolic simulation will continue to play a fundamental role in predictive breeding. A hybrid tool that implements both approaches can be extremely powerful to evaluate predictive breeding strategies in silico. One promising direction is to simulate novel genotypes using conventional methods, then apply generative models to produce realistic phenotypes conditional on genotype and environment.

Teacher education students play double role as present learners and future educators. Hence, they need targeted training to navigate the growing influence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on teaching, learning and professional identity. However, existing artificial intelligence (AI) literacy programmes predominantly emphasize technical AI knowledge and pre‐GenAI tools or are offered by GenAI platforms that focus on their own technologies' features, thereby lacking pedagogically structured frameworks that address non‐technical dimensions such as ethics, contextual understanding and the development of human‐centered, critical and lifelong learning mindsets to adapt to rapid technology changes. Furthermore, limitation of time in teacher education syllabus and faculty's lack of AI literacy require targeted intervention. This design‐based research (DBR) aims to fill this gap by developing and evaluating a set of design principles for GenAI literacy training in teacher education. Integrating contemporary AI competency frameworks for learners and teachers, the study implements these principles in a workshop that serves as the research prototype. The prototype was first piloted with 14 master's students and then evaluated with 29 teacher education (TE) students. Results show significant gains in participants' AI competence self‐efficacy, attitudes towards GenAI and commitment to critical, ethical and pedagogical engagement with GenAI tools. The findings highlight the need for teacher education programmes to integrate GenAI literacy that supports teachers' evolving roles as reflective practitioners, co‐creators and lifelong learners in an AI‐driven world. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Students' self‐efficacy and mindset influence their adoption of GenAI in learning and teaching. GenAI competency is essential for teacher education students, encompassing technological, ethical and sociocultural dimensions. Implementing AI literacy training faces challenges such as educators' limited AI literacy, the lack of pedagogical frameworks and the need to integrate technical knowledge with ethical reasoning, self‐regulated learning and metacognitive skills. Transformative learning is crucial in preparing teacher education students as co‐creators and facilitators in AI‐enhanced education. What this paper adds This study presents the design and evaluation of an AI competency training programme to enhance teacher education students' self‐efficacy, critical and human‐centered AI mindsets and human–AI interaction skills. Using design‐based research, it identifies key principles for AI literacy training, demonstrating how transformative, active and experiential learning approaches can prepare teacher education students for evolving roles in AI‐enhanced education. Implications for practice and/or policy Educational technologists can apply the proposed design principles to develop GenAI tools and AI systems that enhance AI competency and self‐regulated learning (SRL). Educators can integrate these AI training principles into their teaching strategies and enhance their task assignments and assessments to foster deep learning, self‐regulated learning and metacognitive skills in the age of GenAI. Policymakers should update teacher education curriculum to include AI competency, strengthen content and pedagogical knowledge, especially in social emotional learning, formative and authentic assessment methods and establish guidelines for selecting GenAI tools that support human intelligence and mitigate over‐reliance.