Models for Behavioral Synthesis

Background: In recent years, the rising demand for high-performance radar systems in aeronautics, astronautics, national defense, and civil communication has driven the widespread application of phased-array technology. The design of beam controllers, the core of phased-array systems, faces many challenges. Traditional implementation schemes are usually based on application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC) or discrete components, which have a long development cycle, poor flexibility, and limited adaptability. Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), with their high parallelism, reconfigurability, and powerful signal processing capabilities, offer a new way to implement phased-array control systems. But FPGA design has traditionally relied on register transfer level (RTL) description, which is inefficient and struggles to keep up with the rapid iteration of complex algorithms. With the development of high-level synthesis (HLS) technology, it has become possible to develop FPGAs using high-level languages such as C/C++. However, improving development efficiency while ensuring hardware performance remains a key issue in the design of phased-array beam controllers. Materials and Methods: This study employs an HLS - RTL co - design method to build a phased - array beam controller. This approach combines the strengths of HLS's efficient algorithm implementation and RTL's precise hardware interface control. The system architecture consists of three parts: the host - machine control layer, FPGA processing layer, and phase - control output layer. In the FPGA processing layer, the core beam - forming algorithm is implemented via HLS. Based on phased - array principles, this algorithm converts target angles to wave vectors and calculates phase - compensation values for each element in an 8×8 array. Pipelining and parallel processing techniques are used in the HLS design to optimize algorithm throughput and latency. The phase - control output layer, designed with RTL, repackages 64 calculated phase values and distributes them to 16 physical phase - shifter chips. Each phase - shifter manages four elements and receives control data through an SPI interface. Results: The proposed FPGA-based phased-array beam controller design in this paper has successfully achieved high - speed, high - precision beam control. By using the HLS - RTL co - design method, it has solved the problem of low algorithm implementation efficiency in traditional FPGA development and ensured the high performance and reliability of hardware interfaces. Experimental results indicate that the system meets or surpasses design targets on key performance indicators. Its end - to - end latency is kept within 130μs, it supports an angle update rate of over 5,000 times per second, and can satisfy the requirements for tracking highly dynamic targets in practical applications. Conclusion: The major contributions of this research are as follows: presenting an HLS - RTL co - design methodology for complex FPGA system development; designing an efficient phased - array beam - forming algorithm and its hardware implementation; and developing a flexible and scalable phased - array control system architecture that supports different array configurations. These findings are highly significant for beamforming technologies in phased - array radar and 5G communication systems, as well as for other FPGA applications requiring high - speed signal processing.

An inherent performance gap between custom designs and ASICs is one of the reasons why many designers still start their designs from register transfer level (RTL) description rather than from behavioral description, which can be synthesized to RTL via high-level synthesis (HLS). Sequencing overhead is one of the factors for this performance gap; the choice between latch and flip-flop is not typically taken into account during HLS, even though it affects all the steps of HLS. HLS-l is a new design framework that employs high-performance latches during scheduling, allocation, and controller synthesis. Its main feature is a new scheduler that is based on a concept of phase step (as opposed to conventional control step), which allows us scheduling in finer granularity, register allocation that resolves the conflict of latch being read and written at the same time, and controller synthesis that exploits dual-edge triggered storage elements to support phase step based scheduling. In experiments on benchmark designs implemented in 1.2 V, 65-nm CMOS technology, HLS-l reduced latency by 16.6% on average, with 9.5% less circuit area, compared to the designs produced by conventional HLS.

Due to the rapidly increasing complexity in hardware designs and competitive time to market trends in the industry, there is an inherent need to move designs to a higher level of abstraction. Behavioral Synthesis is the process of automatically compiling such Electronic System Level (ESL) designs written in high-level languages such as C, C++ or SystemC into Register-Transfer Level (RTL) implementation in hardware description languages such as Verilog or VHDL. However, the adoption of this flow is dependent on designers' faith in the correctness of behavioral synthesis tools. Loop pipelining is a critical transformation employed in behavioral synthesis process, and ubiquitous in commercial and academic behavioral synthesis tools. It improves the throughput and reduces the latency of the synthesized hardware. It is complex and error-prone, and a small bug can result in faulty hardware with expensive ramifications. Therefore, it is critical to certify the loop pipelining transformation so that designers can trust the behaviorally synthesized pipelined designs. Certifying a loop pipelining transformation is however, a major research challenge because there is a huge semantic gap between the input sequential design and the output pipelined implementation, making it infeasible to verify their equivalence with automated sequential equivalence checking (SEC) techniques. Complex loop pipelining transformations can be certified by a combination of theorem proving and SEC: (1) creating a certified pipelining algorithm which generates a reference pipeline model by exploiting pipeline generation information from the synthesis flow (e.g. the iteration interval of a generated pipeline) and (2) conduct SEC between the synthesized pipeline and this reference model. However, a key and arguably, the most complex component of this approach is the development of a formal, mechanically verifiable loop pipelining algorithm. We show how to systematically construct such an algorithm, and carry out its verification using the ACL2 theorem prover. We propose a framework of certified pipelining primitives which are essential for designing pipelining algorithms. Using our framework, we build a certified loop pipelining algorithm. We also propose a key invariant in certifying this algorithm, which links sequential loops with their pipelined counterparts. This is unlike other invariants that have been used in proofs of microprocessor pipelines so far. This dissertation provides a framework for creating certified pipelining algorithms utilizing a mechanical theorem prover. Using this framework, we have developed a certified loop pipelining algorithm. This certified algorithm is essential in the overall approach to certify behaviorally synthesized pipelined designs. We demonstrate the

High-Level Synthesis (HLS) allows designers to create a register transfer level (RTL) description of a digital circuit starting from its high-level specification (e.g., C/C++/SystemC). HLS reduces engineering effort and design-time errors, allowing the integration of additional features. This study introduces an approach to generate benevolent Hardware Trojans (HT) using HLS. Benevolent HTs are Intellectual Property (IP) watermarks that borrow concepts from well-known malicious HTs to ward off piracy and counterfeiting either during the design flow or in fielded integrated circuits. Benevolent HTs are difficult to detect and remove because they are intertwined with the functional units used to implement the IP. Experimental results testify to the suitability of the approach and the limited overhead.

The rapidly increasing complexities of hardware designs are forcing design methodologies and tools to move to the Electronic System Level (ESL), a higher abstraction level with better productivity than the state-of-the-art Register Transfer Level (RTL). Behavioral synthesis, which automatically synthesizes ESL behavioral specifications to RTL implementations, plays a central role in this transition. However, since behavioral synthesis is a complex and error-prone translation process, the lack of designers' confidence in its correctness becomes a major barrier to its wide adoption. Therefore, techniques for establishing equivalence between an ESL specification and its synthesized RTL implementation are critical to bring behavioral synthesis into practice. The major research challenge to equivalence checking for behavioral synthesis is the significant semantic gap between ESL and RTL. The semantics of ESL involve untimed, sequential execution; however, the semantics of RTL involve timed, concurrent execution. We propose a sequential equivalence checking (SEC) framework for certifying a behavioral synthesis flow, which exploits information on successive intermediate design representations produced by the synthesis flow to bridge the semantic gap. In particular, the intermediate design representation after scheduling and pipelining transformations permits effective correspondence of internal operations between this design representation and the synthesized RTL implementation, enabling scalable, compositional equivalence checking. Certifications of loop and function pipelining transformations are possible by a combination of theorem proving and SEC through exploiting pipeline generation information from the synthesis flow (e.g., the iteration interval of a generated pipeline). The complexity brought by bubbles in function pipelines is creatively reduced by symbolically encoding all possible bubble insertions in one pipelined design representation. The result of this dissertation is a robust, practical, and scalable framework for certifying RTL designs synthesized from ESL specifications. We have validated the robustness, practicality, and scalability of our approach on industrial-scale ESL designs that result in tens of thousands of lines of RTL implementations.

High-level synthesis operates on internal models known as control/data flow graphs (CDFG) and produces a register-transfer-level (RTL) model of the hardware implementation for a given schedule. For high-level synthesis to be efficient it has to estimate the effect that a given algorithmic decision (e.g., scheduling, allocation) will have on the final hardware implementation (after logic synthesis). Currently, this effect cannot be measured accurately because the CDFGs are very distinct from the RTL/gate-level models used by logic synthesis, precluding interaction between high-level and logic synthesis. This paper presents a solution to this problem consisting of a novel internal model for synthesis which spans the domains of high-level and logic synthesis. This model is an RTL/gate-level network capable of representing all possible schedules that a given behavior may assume. This representation allows high-level synthesis algorithms to be formulated as logic transformations and effectively interleaved with logic synthesis.

Sequential equivalence checking between system level descriptions of designs and their register transfer level (RTL) implementations is a very challenging and important problem in the context of systems on a chip (SoCs). We propose a technique to alleviate the complexity of the equivalence checking problem, by efficiently decomposing it using compare points. Traditionally, equivalence checking techniques use nominal or functional mapping of latches as compare points. Since we operate at a level where design descriptions are in system level languages or hardware description languages, we leverage the information available to us at this level in deducing sequential compare points. Sequential compare points encapsulate the sequential behavior of designs and are obtained by statically analyzing the design descriptions. We decompose the design using sequential compare points and represent the design behavior at these compare points by symbolic expressions. We use a SAT solver to check the equivalence of the symbolic expressions. In order to demonstrate our technique, we present results on a non-trivial case study. We show an equivalence check between a SystemC description and two different Verilog RTL implementations of a Viterbi decoder, that is a component of the DRM SoC.

In this paper, we propose a new testability analysis method for Register-Transfer Level (RTL) descriptions. The proposed method is based on the idea of testability analysis in terms of data-flow and control structure which can be extracted from RTL designs. We analyze testability of RTL descriptions with more testability measures than those of conventional gate-level testability, so that the method provides information for design for testability (DFT). We have implemented the presented method and experimental results show that we can reduce circuit cost for test and achieve highly testable circuits by DFT using our RTL testability analysis.

This paper describes an intermediate representation for behavioral and structural designs that is based on annotated state tables. It facilitates user control of the synthesis process by allowing specification of partially design structures, and a mixture of behavior, structure and user specified bindings between the abstract behavior and the structure. The format's general model allows the capture of synchronous and asynchronous behavior, and permits hierarchical descriptions with concurrency. The format is easily translated to VHDL for simulation at each stage of the design process. It therefore complements a good simulation language (VHDL) by providing an excellent input path for behavioral and register-transfer synthesis. The format's simple and uniform syntax allows it to be used both as an intermediate exchange format for various behavioral synthesis tools, and as a graphical tabular interface for the user, thereby allowing a natural medium for automatic or manual refinement of the design.

One of the major problems within the VHDL based behavioral synthesis is to start the design on higher abstraction level than the register transfer level (RTL). VHDL semantics was designed strictly for simulation, therefore it was not considered as high‐level synthesis language. A novel synthesis procedure was developed, which uses the methodology of high level synthesis. It starts from an abstract VHDL model and produces an RTL VHDL description through successive language transformations while preserving the VHDL standard simulation semantics. The steps of the synthesis do not use graph representation or other meta‐language, but apply the standard VHDL only. This VHDL representation is simulatable and accessible, functional verification can be performed by simulation at any time, and the simulation results can be used to guide the synthesis process. The output VHDL format is suitable to continue the design flow with RTL based synthesis tools.

Reducing resource usage is one of the most important optimization objectives in behavioral synthesis due to its direct impact on power, performance and cost. The datapath in a typical design is composed of different kinds of components, including functional units, registers and multiplexers. To optimize the overall resource usage, a behavioral synthesis tool should consider all kinds of components at the same time. However, most previous work on behavioral synthesis has the limitations of (i) not being able to consider all kinds of resources globally, and/or (ii) separating the synthesis process into a sequence of optimization steps without a consistent optimization objective. In this paper we present a behavioral synthesis flow in which all types of components in the datapath are modeled and optimized consistently. The key idea is to feed to the scheduler the intentions for sharing functional units and registers in favor of the global optimization goal (such as total area), so that the scheduler could generate a schedule that makes the sharing intentions feasible. Experiments show that compared to the solution of minimizing functional unit requirements in scheduling and using the least number of functional units and registers in binding, our solution achieves a 24% reduction in total area; compared to the online tool provided by c-to-verilog.com, our solution achieves a 30% reduction on average.

Transaction level (TL) models are key to early design exploration, performance estimation and virtual prototyping. Their speed and accuracy enable early and rapid System-on-Chip (SoC) design evaluation and software development. Most devices have only register transfer level (RTL) models that are too complex for SoC simulation. Abstracting these models to TL ones, however, is a challenging task, especially when the RTL description is too obscure or not accessible. This work presents a methodology for automatically creating a TL model of an RTL memory controller component. The device is treated as a black box and a multitude of simulations is used to obtain results, showing its timing behavior. The results are classified into conditional probability distributions, which are reused within a TL model to approximate the RTL timing behavior. The presented method is very fast and highly accurate. The resulting TL model executes approximately 1200 times faster, with a maximum measured average timing offset error of 7.66%.

High-Level Synthesis (HLS)-based VLSI design flows allow designers to start from high-level specifications in a general-purpose programming language like C/C++ and automatically generate an optimized hardware design in a hardware description language (HDL) like Verilog or VHDL. Supply of compromised computer-aided design (CAD) tools by an electronic design automation (EDA) vendor to the chip designers is a great threat that adversely affects the horizontal semiconductor business model. Recent works have examined the potential for security issues induced by a compromised HLS CAD tool and demonstrated how HLS is a prime candidate for hardware Trojan (HT) insertion into any underlying design since it is hard to correlate the high-level description to the generated register-transfer level (RTL) code. Further, it has been shown that the use of compiler-generated intermediate representation (IR) as a likely attack vector for inserting HT in the RTL during an HLS-based IC design flow, taking advantage of the lack of automated methods to analyse logic inside a complex LLVM IR. In this work, we propose, implement, and evaluate a novel HLS security verification framework by leveraging the modern large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we focus on detecting the HTs introduced using Black-Hat HLS and HLS-IRT toolchain by performing functional verification using LLM. The experimental results show that LLMs have an impressive ability to analyse and automatically identify these hardware security anomalies.

The growing complexity of modern digital design makes designers shift toward starting design exploration using high-level languages, and generating register transfer level (RTL) design from system level modeling (SLM) using high-level synthesis or manual transformation. Unfortunately, this translation process is very complex and may introduce bugs into the generated design. In this paper, we propose a novel SLM and RTL sequential equivalence checking method. The proposed method bases on Finite state machines with datapath (FSMD) equivalence checking method. The proposed method recognizes the corresponding path-pairs of FSMDs using machine learning (ML) technique from all the paths. And then it compares the corresponding path-pairs by symbolic simulation. The advantage of our method is that it separates the corresponding path-pairs from all the paths and avoids blind comparisons of path-pairs. Our method can deal with greatly different SLM and RTL designs and dramatically reduce the complexity of the path-based FSMD equivalence checking problem. The promising experimental results show the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method.

The primary objective of high-level synthesis is to provide automatic ways of translating the behavioral specification of a digital system, under a given set of design constraints, into a register-transfer (RT) level description consisting of a (possibly partitioned) control unit and some computing (i.e., data-path) units [1,2]. The control logic, usually represented as a state-transition table or a finite state machine, is then generated using common sequential synthesis techniques. The data-path modules, on the other hand, are properly mapped onto the macrocomponents (such as adders, comparators, registers, and memories) belonging to the target library.