On Finding the Optimal BDD Relaxation

Specific physical defects of high performance circuits manifest themselves as path delay faults (PDFs). A pair (v1, v2) of test patterns is required to detect a PDF. A PDF is robust testable if there is a test pair on which the fault manifestation does not depend on delays of other circuit paths. A PDF is non robust testable if manifestation of the fault on any test pair is possible only when all other paths of the circuit are fault free. For high quality delay testing it is desirable to detect delay of any path regardless of delays of other paths. In this paper, synthesis of a circuit by covering each nonterminal node of the reduced ordered binary decision diagram (ROBDD) or free binary decision diagram (Free BDD) system with the original subcircuit from gates is suggested. Delay testability of such circuits is investigated. It is specified that the PDF of each path of the circuit is detected without injecting additional inputs into the circuit. It is well known that the BDD is a directed acyclic graph based on the Shannon decomposition in each nonterminal node v: 0 1 i i x x v i v i v f x f x f = = = ∨ . Here fv is the function corresponding to the node v, and the decomposition variable xi marks the node v. The dashed edge drops in the node corresponding to the function 0 i x v f = , and the bold edge drops in the node corresponding to the function 1 i x v f = . The BDD is called ordered (OBDD) if variables are encountered in the same order in all paths connecting the BDD root with the terminal node. The BDD is called reduced (RBDD) if it does not contain either isomorphic subgraphs or nonterminal nodes such that 0 1 i i x x v v f f = = = . An example of reduced and ordered BDD (ROBDD) is shown in Fig. 1. When deriving the Free BDD, a suitable decomposition variable is chosen for each nonterminal node v independently of other nonterminal nodes. That may cut the number of Free BDD of nonterminal nodes in comparison with the ROBDD (for the same function). Let 1 { ,..., } m F f f = be a system of Boolean functions describing combinational circuit behavior. Derive the ROBDD using the same order of variables for each Boolean function from F. Join isomorphic subgraphs in different ROBDDs. Combine different ROBDDs of 1-terminal nodes into one 1-terminal node and their 0-terminal nodes into one 0-terminal node. As a result, we obtain the graph with m roots and two terminal nodes. This graph represents a system of m Boolean functions. It is called the shared ROBDD. Without loss of generality, we will further consider systems with one function as an example. In Fig. 1, the ROBDD for one Boolean function is shown. The ROBDD represents the disjoint sum of products (DSoP) of the function f as follows:

An ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD) is a directed acyclic graph that represents a Boolean function. Since OBDDs have many nice properties as data structures, they have been extensively studied for decades in both theoretical and practical fields, such as VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) design, formal verification, machine learning, and combinatorial problems. Arguably, the most crucial problem in using OBDDs is that they may vary exponentially in size depending on their variable ordering (i.e., the order in which the variables are to be read) when they represent the same function. Indeed, it is NP hard to find an optimal variable ordering that minimizes an OBDD for a given function. Friedman and Supowit provided a clever deterministic algorithm with time/space complexity O^∗(3ⁿ), where n is the number of variables of the function, which is much better than the trivial brute-force bound O^∗(n!2ⁿ). This paper shows that a further speedup is possible with quantum computers by presenting a quantum algorithm that produces a minimum OBDD together with the corresponding variable ordering in O^∗(2.77286ⁿ) time and space with an exponentially small error probability. Moreover, this algorithm can be adapted to constructing other minimum decision diagrams such as zero-suppressed BDDs.

This special issue of the VLSI DESIGN: an International Journal of Custom-Chip Design, Simulation and Testing is devoted to spectral techniques, new types of decision trees and diagrams, their applications, efficient ways of their calculation and mutual relations between spectral techniques and classical decision diagrams. Manipulations and calculations with discrete functions are fundamental tasks in many areas of Computer Science and Engineering. Many problems in digital system design, simulation and testing can be expressed as a sequence of operations on discrete functions. The performance of Computer-Aided Design systems used in solving various problems in this area strongly depends on the efficiency of representations of discrete functions. Decision Diagrams (DDs) have proved very convenient data structure for discrete function representations, permitting manipulations and calculations with large functions efficiently in terms of time and space. In many applications, as for example those involving large matrices, conventional algorithms are significantly improved by using DDs. In logic design, such applications relate to basic problems of the design, verification, simulation and testing logical networks. Besides Boolean functions, some other types of discrete representations, such as multi-valued functions, cube sets, EXOR-based spectral and probabilistic formulas have to be dealt with. Hence the numbers of different decision trees and diagrams have been introduced for these various applications and representations. The spectral or polynomial representation of Boolean function is obtained by expressing it in terms of an orthogonal basis. The most popular basis is formed by discrete Walsh functions. Note that the spectral and the polynomial representation of a Boolean function are equivalent. The discrete orthogonal functions are referred to as the basis functions when the spectral or abstract harmonic terminology is used and as monomials when the polynomial terminology is used. Such polynomial representations have extensive applications in coding theory and cryptography as well as design of nonlinear filters. Spectral techniques based on Walsh, Haar, Arithmetic and Reed–Muller transforms have been used in digital logic design for more than 30 years. These techniques have been used for Boolean function classification, disjoint decomposition, identification of symmetries, parallel and serial linear decomposition, spectral translation synthesis (extraction of linear preand post-filters), multiplexer synthesis, threshold logic synthesis, state assignment and testing, and evaluation of logic complexity. The renewed interest in applications of spectral methods in design of VLSI digital circuits is caused by their excellent design for testability properties and in their efficiency in Boolean mapping problems. Furthermore, the practical applicability of these techniques was greatly improved with the development of efficient methods that allow calculating and operating on spectra of Boolean functions directly from reduced representations of such functions in the form of arrays of cubes or decision diagrams. Following from these recent developments, techniques have been presented for efficient spectral translation to decompose a circuit into a cascade of two sub circuits: linear block composed of EXOR gates fed by the primary input of the overall circuit. Such linear decomposition drastically simplifies the synthesis task. The choice of suitable linear transformation is based on a complexity measure assigned to each Boolean function that is heuristically related to the complexity of the final circuit implementation. To avoid the experimental costs of computing the Walsh transform, Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) based techniques are used. Recently the idea of linear transformations is applied to decision diagrams. By combining powerful spectral linear techniques with variable reordering techniques, it is possible to synthesize large Boolean functions with standard Computer-Aided Design tools that fail otherwise. The areas addressed by this special issue span spectral transforms, their applications and efficient calculation methods through decision diagrams. New spectral decision diagrams are also emerging that support larger data structures allowing more complex discrete representations to be implemented that was previously impossible.

Formal verification is fundamental in many phases of digital systems design. The most successful verification procedures employ Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (OBDDs) as canonical representation for both Boolean circuit specifications and logic designs, but these methods require a large amount of memory and time. Due to these limitations, several models of Decision Diagrams have been studied and other verification techniques have been proposed. In this paper, we have used probabilistic verification with Galois (or finite) field GF(2m) modifying the CUDD package for the computation of signatures in classical OBDDs, and for the construction of Mod2-OBDDs (also known as ?-OBDDs). Mod2-OBDDs have been constructed with a two-level layer of ?-nodes using a positive Davio expansion (pDE) for a given variable. The sizes of the Mod2-OBDDs obtained with our method are lower than the Mod2-OBDDs sizes obtained with other similar methods.

The Sentential Decision Diagram (SDD) is a prominent knowledge representation language that subsumes the Ordered Binary Decision Diagram (OBDD) as a strict subset. Like OBDDs, SDDs have canonical forms and support bottom-up operations for combining SDDs, but they are more succinct than OBDDs. In this paper we introduce an SDD variant, called the Zero-suppressed Sentential Decision Diagram (ZSDD). The key idea of ZSDD is to employ new trimming rules for obtaining a canonical form. As a result, ZSDD subsumes the Zero-suppressed Binary Decision Diagram (ZDD) as a strict subset. ZDDs are known for their effectiveness on representing sparse Boolean functions. Likewise, ZSDDs can be more succinct than SDDs when representing sparse Boolean functions. We propose several polytime bottom-up operations over ZSDDs, and a technique for reducing ZSDD size, while maintaining applicability to important queries. We also specify two distinct upper bounds on ZSDD sizes; one is derived from the treewidth of a CNF and the other from the size of a family of sets. Experiments show that ZSDDs are smaller than SDDs or ZDDs for a standard benchmark dataset.

We consider a model of computation for discrete functions—Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (OBDD).We investigate comparative complexity of quantum, deterministic, probabilistic and nondeterministic (quantum and classical) OBDDs for total and partial functions. The measure of complexity is a width of OBDD. It is known that for total functions bounded error quantum OBDDs can be exponentially more effective than deterministic and bounded error probabilistic OBDDs. We show that such quantum OBDDs also can be exponentially more effective than nondeterministic OBDDs (both quantum and classical). For partial functions the gap can be more significant. For partial function depending on a parameter k exact quantum OBDD has the width two. Deterministic and bounded error probabilistic OBDD for this function must have a width exponentially depending on k.

Bent Boolean functions exist only for an even number of variables, moreover, they are unbalanced. Therefore, they are used in coding theory and in many areas of computer science. General form of bent functions is still unknown. One way of representing Boolean functions is with a reduced ordered binary decision diagram (ROBDD). The strength of ROBDDs is that they can represent Boolean functions data with a high level of redundancy in a compact form, as long as the data is encoded in such a way that the redundancy is exposed. This paper investigates characteristics of bent functions with focus on their ROBDD parameters. Decision diagram experimental framework has been used for implementation of a program for calculation of the ROBDD parameters. The results presented in this paper are intended to be used to create methods for the construction of bent functions using a ROBDD as a data structure from which the bent functions can be discovered.

Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs) have traditionally been built in a bottom-up fashion. In this scheme, the intermediate peak memory utilization is often larger than the final ROBDD size, limiting the complexity of the circuits which can be processed using ROBDDS. Recently we showed that for a large number of applications, the peak memory requirement can be substantially reduced by a suitable combination of bottom up (decomposition based) and top down (composition based) approaches of building ROBDDs. In this paper, we focus on the composition process. We detail four heuristic algorithms for finding good composition orders, and compare their utility on a set of standard benchmark circuits. Our schemes offer a matrix of time-memory tradeoff points.

Reduced Ordered Binary Decision diagrams (ROBDDs) are nowadays one of the most common dynamic data structures for Boolean functions. Among the many areas of application are verification, model checking, and computer aided design. In the last few years, SAT checkers, based on the CNF representation of Boolean functions are getting more and more attention as an alternative to the ROBDD based methods. We show the difference between the CNF representation and the ROBDD representation in one of the most degenerate cases – random monotone 2CNF formulas. We examine this model and give almost matching lower and upper bounds for the ROBDD size in different cases, and show that as soon as the formulas are non-trivial the ROBDD size becomes exponential, thus showing perhaps one of the most fundamental advantages of SAT solvers over ROBDDs.

Translation among CNFs, characteristic models and ordered binary decision diagrams

The ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD) has proven useful in many applications as an efficient data structure for representing and manipulating Boolean functions. A serious drawback of OBDD's is the need for application-specific heuristic algorithms to order the variables before processing. Further, for many problem instances in logic synthesis, the heuristic ordering algorithms which have been proposed are insufficient to allow OBDD operations to complete within a limited amount of memory. The paper proposes a solution to these problems based on having the OBDD package itself determine and maintain the variable order. This is done by periodically applying a minimization algorithm to reorder the variables of the OBDD to reduce its size. A new OBDD minimization algorithm, called the sifting algorithm, is proposed and appears especially effective in reducing the size of the OBDD. Experiments with dynamic variable ordering on the problem of forming the OBDD's for the primary outputs of a combinational circuit show that many computations complete using dynamic variable ordering when the same computation fails otherwise.

This paper studies the relative efficiency of ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs) and the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland procedure (DPLL), two of the main approaches to solving Boolean satisfiability instances. Especially, we show that OBDDs, even when constructed using only the rather weak axiom and join rules, can be exponentially more efficient than DPLL or, equivalently, tree-like resolution. Additionally, by strengthening via simple arguments a recent result--stating that such OBDDs do not polynomially simulate unrestricted resolution--we also show that the opposite holds: there are cases in which DPLL is exponentially more efficient out of the two considered systems. Hence DPLL and OBDDs constructed using only the axiom and join rules are polynomially incomparable. This further highlights differences between search-based and compilation-based approaches to Boolean satisfiability.

We follow up on the idea of Lars Arge to rephrase the Reduce and Apply operations of Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) as iterative I/O-efficient algorithms. We identify multiple avenues to simplify and improve the performance of his proposed algorithms. Furthermore, we extend the technique to other common BDD operations, many of which are not derivable using Apply operations alone. We provide asymptotic improvements to the few procedures that can be derived using Apply.Our work has culminated in a BDD package named Adiar that is able to efficiently manipulate BDDs that outgrow main memory. This makes Adiar surpass the limits of conventional BDD packages that use recursive depth-first algorithms. It is able to do so while still achieving a satisfactory performance compared to other BDD packages: Adiar, in parts using the disk, is on instances larger than 9.5 GiB only 1.47 to 3.69 times slower compared to CUDD and Sylvan, exclusively using main memory. Yet, Adiar is able to obtain this performance at a fraction of the main memory needed by conventional BDD packages to function.

With the complexity of integrated circuits is continually increasing, a local defect in circuits may cause multiple faults. The behavior of a digital circuit with a multiple fault may significantly differ from that of a single fault. A new method for the detection of multiple faults in digital circuits is presented in this paper, the method is based on binary decision diagram (BDD). First of all, the BDDs for the normal circuit and faulty circuit are built respectively. Secondly, a test BDD is obtained by the XOR operation of the BDDs corresponds to normal circuit and faulty circuit. In the test BDD, each input assignment that leads to the leaf node labeled 1 is a test vector of multiple faults. Therefore, the test set of multiple faults is generated by searching for the type of input assignments in the test BDD. Experimental results on some digital circuits show the feasibility of the approach presented in this paper.

Determinant decision diagram (DDD) uses a Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) to represent the Laplace expansion of a determinant. It is used as the core computation engine in some modern symbolic circuit simulators. The traditional implementations rely on a BDD package for the common-data sharing operations in which symbol ordering plays an essential role. This paper proposes a simple implementation method which does not use any BDD package. Sharing is implemented by directly hashing minors, while the requirement on symbol ordering is weakened to an expansion ordering. The basic mechanism used is a natural formulation of layered expansion which is analogous to manual expansion of a determinant, hence it is easily understood. The simplified DDD construction method not only makes the DDD implementation straightforward, but also results in greater efficiency. A simulator developed based on this new method solves the μa725 op-amp circuit in a few seconds by flat expansion.