Prioritized aggregation operators

In this paper, we investigate the uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which the attributes and experts are in different priority level. Motivated by the idea of prioritized aggregation operators (R. R. Yager, Prioritized aggregation operators, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning48 (2008) 263–274.), we develop some prioritized aggregation operators for aggregating uncertain linguistic information, and then apply them to develops some models for uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which the attributes and experts are in different priority level. Finally, a practical example about talent introduction is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problem based on the arithmetic, geometric aggregation operators and Hamacher operations with picture fuzzy information. Then, motivated by the ideal of traditional arithmetic, geometric aggregation operators and Hamacher operations, we have developed some aggregation operators for aggregating picture fuzzy information: picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators, picture fuzzy Hamacher geometric aggregation operators, picture fuzzy Hamacher correlated aggregation operators, induced picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators, induced picture fuzzy Hamacher correlated aggregation operators, picture fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators, picture fuzzy Hamacher power aggregation operators. Then, we have utilized these operators to develop some approaches to solve the picture fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems. Finally, a practical example for enterprise resource planning (ERP) system selection is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

This paper clarifies, how a preference aggregation problem can be solved using the prioritized aggregation operators (PAO), where, a given group of candidates should be aggregated based upon their satisfaction for a collection of ranked places. The comparison results show that the proposed method can accurate aggregate a preference ranking system with less computation and without the need to solve any mathematical model. Also, a metasearch application shows the usefulness of applying the PAO for a preference aggregation. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prioritized multi-criteria decision making based on preference relations

This paper introduces the ordered weighted average inflation (OWAI). The OWAI operator aggregates the information of a set of inflations and provides a range of scenarios from the minimum and the maximum inflation. The advantage of this approach is that it can provide a flexible inflation formula that can be adapted to the specific characteristics of the enterprise, region, state or country. Therefore, the novelty of this operator is that experts can forecast the information and provide optimistic or pessimistic results of the expected average inflation according to the knowledge, aptitude or expectations for the whole country or an event that represents a specific sector, market or industry. The paper develops several extensions by using the induced, heavy and prioritized aggregation operators. The work studies the applicability of the operator to the analysis of Mexican inflation by developing some aggregation systems that consider the average inflation of Mexico.

PurposeSingle-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs) are efficient models to address the complexity issues potentially with three components, namely indeterminacy, truthness and falsity. Taking advantage of SVNSs, this paper introduces some new aggregation operators (AOs) for information fusion of single-valued neutrosophic numbers (SVNNs) to meet multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) challenges.Design/methodology/approachEinstein operators are well-known AOs for smooth approximation, and prioritized operators are suitable to take advantage of prioritized relationships among multiple criteria. Motivated by the features of these operators, new hybrid aggregation operators are proposed named as “single-valued neutrosophic Einstein prioritized weighted average (SVNEPWA) operator” and “single-valued neutrosophic Einstein prioritized weighted geometric (SVNEPWG) operators.” These hybrid aggregation operators are more efficient and reliable for information aggregation.FindingsA robust approach for MCGDM problems is developed to take advantage of newly developed hybrid operators. The effectiveness of the proposed MCGDM method is demonstrated by numerical examples. Moreover, a comparative analysis and authenticity analysis of the suggested MCGDM approach with existing approaches are offered to examine the practicality, validity and superiority of the proposed operators.Originality/valueThe study reveals that by choosing a suitable AO as per the choice of the expert, it will provide a wide range of compromise solutions for the decision-maker.

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique and approach have been a trending topic in decision making and systems engineering to choosing the probable optimal options. The primary purpose of this article is to develop prioritized operators to multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norms (At-CN&t-Ns) under interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy (IVDHF) environment. A new score function is defined for finding the rank of alternatives in MCDM problems with IVDHF information based on priority levels of criteria imposed by the decision maker. This paper introduces two aggregation operators: At-CN&t-N-based IVDHF prioritized weighted averaging (AIVDHFPWA), and weighted geometric (AIVDHFPWG) aggregation operators. Some of their desirable properties are also investigated in details. A methodology for prioritization-based MCDM is derived under IVDHF information. An illustrative example concerning MCDM problem about a Chinese university for appointing outstanding oversea teachers to strengthen academic education is considered. The method is also applicable for solving other real-life MCDM problems having IVDHF information.

Information stored in a database is often subject to uncertainty and imprecision. Probability theory provides a well-known and well understood way of representing uncertainty and may thus be used to provide a mechanism for storing uncertain information in a database. We consider the problem of aggregation using an imprecise probability data model that allows us to represent imprecision by partial probabilities and uncertainty using probability distributions. Most work to date has concentrated on providing functionality for extending the relational algebra with a view to executing traditional queries on uncertain or imprecise data. However, for imprecise and uncertain data, we often require aggregation operators that provide information on patterns in the data. Thus, while traditional query processing is tuple-driven, processing of uncertain data is often attribute-driven where we use aggregation operators to discover attribute properties. The aggregation operator that we define uses the Kullback-Leibler information divergence between the aggregated probability distribution and the individual tuple values to provide a probability distribution for the domain values of an attribute or group of attributes. The provision of such aggregation operators is a central requirement in furnishing a database with the capability to perform the operations necessary for knowledge discovery in databases.

Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets (PHFSs) are currently attracting the attention of numerous scholars due to their efficiency in representing uncertain and fuzzy information. PHFSs are more convenient than hesitant fuzzy sets for decision makers to provide their preference information. However, several important issues in PHFSs utilization remain to be addressed. The shortcomings of the operations in PHFSs are discussed in this paper. Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy prioritized weighted average (PHFPWA) and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy prioritized weighted geometric (PHFPWG) operators are developed on the basis of idea of prioritized aggregation operators, and their properties are described. The relationship between PHFPWA and PHFPWG operators is investigated. A multi-attribute decision-making method based on the proposed operators is presented. Two practical examples are provided to illustrate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method. Comparison analysis and discussion with other aggregation operators based on the same examples are provided.

This study investigates the multiple attribute decision making under triangular fuzzy environment in which the attributes and experts are in different priority level. By combining the idea of quasi arithmetic mean and prioritized weighted average (PWA) operator, we first propose two new prioritized aggregation operators called quasi fuzzy prioritized weighted average (QFPWA) operator and the quasi fuzzy prioritized weighted ordered weighted average (QFPWOWA) operator for aggregating triangular fuzzy information. The properties of the new aggregation operators are studied in detail and their special cases are examined. Furthermore, based on the QFPWA operator and QFPWOWA operator, an approach to deal with multiple attribute decision-making problems under triangular fuzzy environments is developed. Finally, a practical example is provided to illustrate the multiple attribute decision making process.

In view of the environment competencies, selecting the optimal green supplier is one of the crucial issues for enterprises, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies can more easily solve this green supplier selection (GSS) problem. In addition, prioritized aggregation (PA) operator can focus on the prioritization relationship over the criteria, Choquet integral (CI) operator can fully take account of the importance of criteria and the interactions among them, and Bonferroni mean (BM) operator can capture the interrelationships of criteria. However, most existing researches cannot simultaneously consider the interactions, interrelationships and prioritizations over the criteria, which are involved in the GSS process. Moreover, the interval type-2 fuzzy set (IT2FS) is a more effective tool to represent the fuzziness. Therefore, based on the advantages of PA, CI, BM and IT2FS, in this paper, the interval type-2 fuzzy prioritized Choquet normalized weighted BM operators with λ fuzzy measure and generalized prioritized measure are proposed, and some properties are discussed. Then, a novel MCDM approach for GSS based upon the presented operators is developed, and detailed decision steps are given. Finally, the applicability and practicability of the proposed methodology are demonstrated by its application in the shared-bike GSS and by comparisons with other methods. The advantages of the proposed method are that it can consider interactions, interrelationships and prioritizations over the criteria simultaneously.

We deal the problem of aggregation of individual judgments for a global evaluation of a candidate or a product. In our theoretically oriented approach, aggregation operators are compared with each other based on their mathematical properties. We show that any monotone and strategy-proof operators is characterized by a particular collection of decision makers.

For the aggregation problem of attributes with a correlation relationship, it is often necessary to take the correlation factor into account in order to make the decision results more objective and reasonable. The Heronian mean is an aggregation operator which reflects the interaction between attributes. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study and popularize the multiple attribute decision-making methods based on the Heronian mean operator. In this paper, we first give a new three-parameter generalized weighted Heronian mean (TPGWHM), which has a series of excellent properties such as idempotency, monotonicity and boundedness. At the same time, the relationship between the TPGWHM and the existing aggregation operators is given. Then, we propose the intuitionistic fuzzy three-parameter generalized weighted Heronian mean (IFTPGWHM) and give its idempotency, monotonicity, boundedness and limit properties. On this basis, a multiple attribute decision-making method based on the TPGWHM and a multiple attribute decision-making method based on the IFTPGWHM are given, and corresponding examples are given and analyzed.

In this work, we will deal with two different but related problems for a family of aggregation operators. On one hand, we will deal with a dimensional problem of this family. It is important to notice that in practice, it is frequent that some information can get lost, be deleted or added, and each time a cardinality change occurs a new aggregation operator Am has to be used to aggregate the new collection of m elements, and therefore a relation between {An} and {Am} does not necessarily exist in a family of aggregation operators. In this context, it seems natural to incorporate some properties to maintain the logical consistency between these families when changes on the cardinality of the data occur, for which we need to be able to build up a definition of family of aggregation operators in terms of its logical consistency, and solve each problem of aggregation without knowing apriori the cardinality of the data. This is, the operators that compose a FAO have to be somehow related, so the aggregation process remains the same throughout the possible changes in the dimension n of the data. 
\nThe second concept presented in this work is related with the consistency in of the aggregation operator family when the data that have to be aggregated possess an inherent structure. In our opinion, the idea and definition of consistency of a aggregation family should also take into account the structure of the data. Data structure refers to the relative position of information units. Some preliminary ideas can be founded, in which the structure of a set of fuzzy classes is included
\nin order to distinguish between some apparently similar situations which however present different underlying structures (as the interval-valued fuzzy sets and the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In other areas as probability theory, it is clear that the estimation process is dependent of the structure of the data that has to be aggregated. These situations are usually represented as a lineal structure (as in a time series) or by means of graph (as in Markov chains).. In this work, we show how it is possible to extend some of these stability ideas for those situations in which the data present some structures

Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain decision (the conclusion) while providing reasons for their choice. The reasons and the conclusion are logically connected propositions. The problem is how a collective judgment on logically interconnected propositions can be defined from individual judgments on the same propositions. It turns out that, despite the fact that the individuals are logically consistent, the aggregation of their judgments may lead to an inconsistent group outcome, where the reasons do not support the conclusion. However, in this paper we claim that collective irrationality should not be the only worry of judgment aggregation. For example, judgment aggregation would not reject a consistent combination of reasons and conclusion that no member voted for. In our view this may not be a desirable solution. This motivates our research about when a social outcome is `compatible' with the individuals' judgments. The key notion that we want to capture is that any individual member has to be able to defend the collective decision. This is guaranteed when the group outcome is compatible with its members views. Judgment aggregation problems are usually studied using classical propositional logic. However, for our analysis we use an argumentation approach to judgment aggregation problems. Indeed the question of how individual evaluations can be combined into a collective one can also be addressed in abstract argumentation. We introduce three aggregation operators that satisfy the condition above, and we offer two definitions of compatibility. Not only does our proposal satisfy a good number of standard judgment aggregation postulates, but it also avoids the problem of individual members of a group having to become committed to a group judgment that is in conflict with their own individual positions.