Software Bug Prediction using Machine Learning Approach

Software testing is an important task in software development activities, and it requires most of the resources, namely, time, cost and effort. To minimize this fatigue, software bug prediction (SBP) models are applied to improve the software quality assurance (SQA) processes by predicting buggy components. The bug prediction models use machine learning classifiers so that bugs can be predicted in software components in some software metrics. These classifiers are characterized by some configurable parameters, called hyper-parameters that need to be optimized to ensure better performance. Many methods have been proposed by researchers to predict the defective components but these classifiers sometimes not perform well when default settings are used for machine learning classifiers. In this paper, software bug prediction model is proposed which uses machine learning classifiers in conjunction with the Artificial Immune Network (AIN) to improve bug prediction accuracy through its hyper-parameter optimization. For this purpose, seven machine learning classifiers, such as support vector machine Radial base function (SVM-RBF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) (Minkowski metric), KNN (Euclidean metric), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Linear discriminate analysis (LDA), Random forest (RF) and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), were used. The experiment was carried out on bug prediction dataset. The results showed that hyper-parameter optimization of machine learning classifiers, using AIN and its applications for software bug prediction, performed better than when classifiers with their default hyper-parameters were used.

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is an important protection instrument for detecting complex network attacks. Various machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) algorithms have been proposed for implementing anomaly-based IDS (AIDS). Our review of the AIDS literature identifies some issues in related work, including the randomness of the selected algorithms, parameters, and testing criteria, the application of old datasets, or shallow analyses and validation of the results. This paper comprehensively reviews previous studies on AIDS by using a set of criteria with different datasets and types of attacks to set benchmarking outcomes that can reveal the suitable AIDS algorithms, parameters, and testing criteria. Specifically, this paper applies 10 popular supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms for identifying effective and efficient ML-AIDS of networks and computers. These supervised ML algorithms include the artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), naive Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms, whereas the unsupervised ML algorithms include the expectation-maximization (EM), k-means, and self-organizing maps (SOM) algorithms. Several models of these algorithms are introduced, and the turning and training parameters of each algorithm are examined to achieve an optimal classifier evaluation. Unlike previous studies, this study evaluates the performance of AIDS by measuring the true positive and negative rates, accuracy, precision, recall, and F-Score of 31 ML-AIDS models. The training and testing time for ML-AIDS models are also considered in measuring their performance efficiency given that time complexity is an important factor in AIDSs. The ML-AIDS models are tested by using a recent and highly unbalanced multiclass CICIDS2017 dataset that involves real-world network attacks. In general, the k-NN-AIDS, DT-AIDS, and NB-AIDS models obtain the best results and show a greater capability in detecting web attacks compared with other models that demonstrate irregular and inferior results.

Surgical site infection (SSI) following a neurosurgical operation is a complication that impacts morbidity, mortality, and economics. Currently, machine learning (ML) algorithms are used for outcome prediction in various neurosurgical aspects. The implementation of ML algorithms to learn from medical data may help in obtaining prognostic information on diseases, especially SSIs. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of various ML models for predicting surgical infection after neurosurgical operations. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who had undergone neurosurgical operations at tertiary care hospitals between 2010 and 2017. Supervised ML algorithms, which included decision tree, naive Bayes with Laplace correction, k-nearest neighbors, and artificial neural networks, were trained and tested as binary classifiers (infection or no infection). To evaluate the ML models from the testing data set, their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), as well as their accuracy, receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were analyzed. Data were available for 1471 patients in the study period. The SSI rate was 4.6%, and the type of SSI was superficial, deep, and organ/space in 1.2%, 0.8%, and 2.6% of cases, respectively. Using the backward stepwise method, the authors determined that the significant predictors of SSI in the multivariable Cox regression analysis were postoperative CSF leakage/subgaleal collection (HR 4.24, p < 0.001) and postoperative fever (HR 1.67, p = 0.04). Compared with other ML algorithms, the naive Bayes had the highest performance with sensitivity at 63%, specificity at 87%, PPV at 29%, NPV at 96%, and AUC at 76%. The naive Bayes algorithm is highlighted as an accurate ML method for predicting SSI after neurosurgical operations because of its reasonable accuracy. Thus, it can be used to effectively predict SSI in individual neurosurgical patients. Therefore, close monitoring and allocation of treatment strategies can be informed by ML predictions in general practice.

Current maintenance intervals of mechanical systems are scheduled a priori based on the life of the system, resulting in expensive maintenance scheduling, and often undermining the safety of passengers. Going forward, the actual usage of a vehicle will be used to predict stresses in its structure, and therefore, to define a specific maintenance scheduling. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can be used to map a reduced set of data coming from real-time measurements of a structure into a detailed/high-fidelity finite element analysis (FEA) model of the same system. As a result, the FEA-based ML approach will directly estimate the stress distribution over the entire system during operations, thus improving the ability to define ad-hoc, safe, and efficient maintenance procedures. The paper initially presents a review of the current state-of-the-art of ML methods applied to finite elements. A surrogate finite element approach based on ML algorithms is also proposed to estimate the time-varying response of a one-dimensional beam. Several ML regression models, such as decision trees and artificial neural networks, have been developed, and their performance is compared for direct estimation of the stress distribution over a beam structure. The surrogate finite element models based on ML algorithms are able to estimate the response of the beam accurately, with artificial neural networks providing more accurate results.

In brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), it is crucial to process brain signals to improve the accuracy of the classification of motor movements. Machine learning (ML) algorithms such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), decision tree (D.T.), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), naive Bayes (N.B.), and support vector machine (SVM) have made significant progress in classification issues. This paper aims to present a signal processing analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals among different feature extraction techniques to train selected classification algorithms to classify signals related to motor movements. The motor movements considered are related to the left hand, right hand, both fists, feet, and relaxation, making this a multiclass problem. In this study, nine ML algorithms were trained with a dataset created by the feature extraction of EEG signals.The EEG signals of 30 Physionet subjects were used to create a dataset related to movement. We used electrodes C3, C1, CZ, C2, and C4 according to the standard 10-10 placement. Then, we extracted the epochs of the EEG signals and applied tone, amplitude levels, and statistical techniques to obtain the set of features. LabVIEW™2015 version custom applications were used for reading the EEG signals; for channel selection, noise filtering, band selection, and feature extraction operations; and for creating the dataset. MATLAB 2021a was used for training, testing, and evaluating the performance metrics of the ML algorithms. In this study, the model of Medium-ANN achieved the best performance, with an AUC average of 0.9998, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient of 0.9552, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.9819, and a loss of 0.0147. These findings suggest the applicability of our approach to different scenarios, such as implementing robotic prostheses, where the use of superficial features is an acceptable option when resources are limited, as in embedded systems or edge computing devices.

Slope stability prediction using integrated metaheuristic and machine learning approaches: A comparative study

In Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), identifying a high risk of conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia (AD) is a primary goal for patient management. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are widely employed to pursue data-driven diagnostic and prognostic goals. An agreement on the stability of these algorithms –when applied to different biomarkers and other conditions– is far from being reached. In this study, we compared the different prognostic performances of three supervised ML algorithms fed with multimodal biomarkers of MCI subjects obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithms predict MCI conversion to AD. They can also be simultaneously employed –with the voting procedure– to improve predictivity. AD prediction accuracy is influenced by the nature of the data (i.e., neuropsychological test scores, cerebrospinal fluid AD-related proteins and APOE ε4, cerebral structural MRI (sMRI) data). In our study, independent of the applied ML algorithms, sMRI data showed the lowest accuracy (0.79) compared to other classes. Multimodal data were helpful in the algorithms’ performances by combining clinical and biological measures. Accordingly, using the three ML algorithms, the highest accuracy (0.90) was reached by employing neuropsychological and AD-related biomarkers. Finally, the feature selection procedure indicated that the most critical variables in the respective classes were the ADAS-Cog-13 scale, the medial temporal lobe and hippocampus atrophy, and the ratio between phosphorylated Tau and Aβ42 proteins. In conclusion, our data support the notion that using multiple ML algorithms and multimodal biomarkers helps make more accurate and solid predictions.

Despite careful patient selection, induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a considerable risk for treatment-related mortality (5%-20%). We evaluated machine learning (ML) algorithms trained using factors available at the time of admission for AML therapy to predict death during the hospitalization. We included AML discharges with age > 17 years who received inpatient chemotherapy from State Inpatient Database from Arizona, Florida, New York, Maryland, Washington, and New Jersey for years 2008-2014. The primary objective was to predict inpatient mortality in patients undergoing chemotherapy using covariates present before initiation of chemotherapy. ML algorithms logistic regression (LR), decision tree, and random forest were compared. 29,613 hospitalizations for patients with AML were included in the analysis each with 4,177 features. The median age was 58.9 (18-101) years, 13,689 (53.7%) were male, and 20,203 (69%) were White. The mean time from admission to chemotherapy was 3 days (95% CI, 2.9 to 3.1), and 2,682 (9.1%) died during the hospitalization. Both LR and random forest models achieved an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.78, whereas decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.70. The baseline LR model with age yielded an AUC of 0.62. To clinically balance and minimize false positives, we selected a decision threshold of 0.7 and at this threshold, 51 of our test set of 5,923 could have potentially averted treatment-related mortality. Using readily accessible variables, inpatient mortality of patients on track for chemotherapy to treat AML can be predicted through ML algorithms. The model also predicted inpatient mortality when tested on different data representations and paves the way for future research.

After radical prostatectomy (RP), one-third of patients will experience biochemical recurrence (BCR), which is associated with subsequent metastasis and cancer-specific mortality. We employed machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict BCR after RP, and compare them with traditional regression models and nomograms. Utilizing a prospective Uro-oncology registry, 18 clinicopathological parameters of 1130 consecutive patients who underwent RP (2009-2018) were recorded, yielding over 20,000 data points for analysis. The data set was split into a 70:30 ratio for training and validation. Three ML models: Naïve Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) were studied, and compared with traditional regression models and nomograms (Kattan, CAPSURE, John Hopkins [JHH]) to predict BCR at 1, 3, and 5 years. Over a median follow-up of 70.0 months, 176 (15.6%) developed BCR, at a median time of 16.0 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.0-26.0). Multivariate analyses demonstrated strongest association of BCR with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (p: 0.015), positive surgical margins (p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (p: 0.002), seminal vesicle invasion (p: 0.004), and grade group (p < 0.001). The 3 ML models demonstrated good prediction of BCR at 1, 3, and 5 years, with the area under curves (AUC) of NB at 0.894, 0.876, and 0.894, RF at 0.846, 0.875, and 0.888, and SVM at 0.835, 0.850, and 0.855, respectively. All models demonstrated (1) robust accuracy (>0.82), (2) good calibration with minimal overfitting, (3) longitudinal consistency across the three time points, and (4) inter-model validity. The ML models were comparable to traditional regression analyses (AUC: 0.797, 0.848, and 0.862) and outperformed the three nomograms: Kattan (AUC: 0.815, 0.798, and 0.799), JHH (AUC: 0.820, 0.757, and 0.750) and CAPSURE nomograms (AUC: 0.706, 0.720, and 0.749) (p < 0.001). Supervised ML algorithms can deliver accurate performances and outperform nomograms in predicting BCR after RP. This may facilitate tailored care provisions by identifying high-risk patients who will benefit from multimodal therapy.

Feature extraction-reduction and machine learning for fault diagnosis in PV panels

New technologies like Machine learning and Big data analytics have been proven to provide promising solutions to biomedical communities, healthcare problems, and patient care. They also help in early prediction of disease by accurate interpretation of medical data. Disease management strategies can further be improved by the detection of early signs of disease. This early prediction, moreover, can be helpful in controlling the symptoms of the disease as well as the proper treatment of disease. Machine learning approaches can be used in the prediction of chronic diseases, such as kidney and heart diseases, by developing the classification models. In this paper, we propose a preprocessing extensive approach to predict Coronary Heart Diseases (CHD). The approach involves replacing null values, resampling, standardization, normalization, classification, and prediction. This work aims to predict the risk of CHD using machine learning algorithms like Random Forest, Decision Trees, and K-Nearest Neighbours. Also, a comparative study among these algorithms on the basis of prediction accuracy is performed. Further, $K$ -fold Cross Validation is used to generate randomness in the data. These algorithms are experimented over “Framingham Heart Study” dataset, which is having 4240 records. In our experimental analysis, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbour achieved an accuracy of 96.8%, 92.7%, and 92.89% respectively. Therefore, by including our preprocessing steps, Random Forest classification gives more accurate results than other machine learning algorithms.

Three-phase induction motors (IMs) are one of the most employed electric machines in industrial and household applications. Condition monitoring of these machines is essential to avoid unplanned maintenance and thereby enhance the availability. Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are emerging as an advanced tool for automating condition monitoring process to detect incipient faults at early stages. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been identified as a promising approach for condition monitoring of IMs and predicting maintenance to avoid failures. However, selecting the suitable ML algorithm for a given application is challenging because there is no predefined set of application-based algorithms. In addition, raw data processing and feature selection need careful attention to improve the accuracy of the results. This paper reviews supervised ML algorithms that can be used for condition monitoring of IMs and identifies their benefits and drawbacks. It then discusses how the dominant features from raw data can be selected through time domain and frequency domain analysis using the acoustic data collected from a three-phase induction motor. The study investigates classification accuracy of each ML algorithm and a procedure for selecting an algorithm based on the experimental results. Results of this study show that Support Vector Machines (SVM) algorithm outperforms other competing algorithms in condition monitoring of IMs when the dominant frequency components obtained through Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) are used as training data.

In the era of artificial intelligence, machine learning methods are successfully used in various fields. Machine learning has attracted extensive attention from investors in the financial market, especially in stock price prediction. However, one argument for the machine learning methods used in stock price prediction is that they are black-box models which are difficult to interpret. In this paper, we focus on the future stock price prediction with the historical stock price by machine learning and deep learning methods, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), Bayesian classifier (BC), decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), bi-directional long-short term memory (BiLSTM), the embedded CNN, and the embedded BiLSTM. Firstly, we manually design several financial time series where the future price correlates with the historical stock prices in pre-designed modes, namely the curve-shape-feature (CSF) and the non-curve-shape-feature (NCSF) modes. In the CSF mode, the future prices can be extracted from the curve shapes of the historical stock prices. Conversely, in the NCSF mode, they can’t. Secondly, we apply various algorithms to those pre-designed and real financial time series. We find that the existing machine learning and deep learning algorithms fail in stock price prediction because in the real financial time series, less information of future prices is contained in the CSF mode, and perhaps more information is contained in the NCSF. Various machine learning and deep learning algorithms are good at handling the CSF in historical data, which are successfully applied in image recognition and natural language processing. However, they are inappropriate for stock price prediction on account of the NCSF. Therefore, accurate stock price prediction is the key to successful investment, and new machine learning algorithms handling the NCSF series are needed.&#x0D;

The look for methodologies that can make inferences from externally supplied data develop broad hypotheses that are subsequently used to create forecasts concerning future events is known as supervised machine learning (SML). This study examine machine learning (ML) classification strategies, compares supervised learning algorithms, and determines foremost efficient classification algorithm based on the data set, number of instances, and variables (features). ML with the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) tool, 7 different machine learning algorithms were considered: Decision Table, Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), neural networks (Perceptron), JRip, and Decision Tree (J48). Time it takes to make a design and be concise (accuracy) are factors on the one end, and the kappa statistic and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) are factors on the other. For supervised predictive machine learning to work, machine learning algorithms must be accurate, and error-free.KeywordsMachine learningMean absolute errorWEKADeep learning

The aging and multimorbid population and health personnel shortages pose a substantial burden on primary health care. While predictive machine learning (ML) algorithms have the potential to address these challenges, concerns include transparency and insufficient reporting of model validation and effectiveness of the implementation in the clinical workflow. To systematically identify predictive ML algorithms implemented in primary care from peer-reviewed literature and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européene (CE) registration databases and to ascertain the public availability of evidence, including peer-reviewed literature, gray literature, and technical reports across the artificial intelligence (AI) life cycle. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Academic Search Premier, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, MathSciNet, AAAI.org (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence), arXiv, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between January 2000 and July 2023, with search terms that were related to AI, primary care, and implementation. The search extended to CE-marked or FDA-approved predictive ML algorithms obtained from relevant registration databases. Three reviewers gathered subsequent evidence involving strategies such as product searches, exploration of references, manufacturer website visits, and direct inquiries to authors and product owners. The extent to which the evidence for each predictive ML algorithm aligned with the Dutch AI predictive algorithm (AIPA) guideline requirements was assessed per AI life cycle phase, producing evidence availability scores. The systematic search identified 43 predictive ML algorithms, of which 25 were commercially available and CE-marked or FDA-approved. The predictive ML algorithms spanned multiple clinical domains, but most (27 [63%]) focused on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Most (35 [81%]) were published within the past 5 years. The availability of evidence varied across different phases of the predictive ML algorithm life cycle, with evidence being reported the least for phase 1 (preparation) and phase 5 (impact assessment) (19% and 30%, respectively). Twelve (28%) predictive ML algorithms achieved approximately half of their maximum individual evidence availability score. Overall, predictive ML algorithms from peer-reviewed literature showed higher evidence availability compared with those from FDA-approved or CE-marked databases (45% vs 29%). The findings indicate an urgent need to improve the availability of evidence regarding the predictive ML algorithms' quality criteria. Adopting the Dutch AIPA guideline could facilitate transparent and consistent reporting of the quality criteria that could foster trust among end users and facilitating large-scale implementation.