• Home
  • Search
  • Use of discriminant analysis to predict arson-prone structures
  • Cite Icon3
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02389991Copy DOI Icon

Use of discriminant analysis to predict arson-prone structures

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The technique of discriminant analysis is widely used for discriminating arson from nonarson structures. Since in this particular case only two groups are involved viz., the arson and the match groups, the computations required for obtaining a discriminant function are relatively simple. Because of this, it is possible to delete a variable by examining the value of a sub i d sub i where a sub i is the coefficient for the i-th variable in the discriminant function and d sub i is the difference between the means for the arson and the match groups for the i th variable (i=1, 2, ... , p). Thus, if a sub i d sub i is less than 0 then we delete the i th variable from consideration because inclusion of such a varable, increases the probability of misclassification. A prior knowledge of a i d i is particularly useful when we have large numbers of variables to be considered. This will help to reduce the number of discriminant functions one needs to consider in order to arrive at the discriminant function which minimizes the misclassification probability. Frequently, in developing a discriminant function one strives to increase the probability of correct classification. However, this probability reflects two components, viz., the probability of correct classification of known arson structures and the probability of correct classification of known nonarson structures. Even if the overall probability of correct classification is high, it does not necessarily imply, as the illustrations of Boston and New York City indicate, that the resulting discriminant function is also efficient in the sense that more arson cases are correctly classified than the nonarson cases. To this end, a procedure has been suggested to compute the cost of the wrong decision for a discriminant function which can be used to compare the cost of two similar types of discriminant functions. Using the relative cost efficiency criterion, it has been shown that the discriminant function for Newark is more efficient than the discriminant function for either Boston or New York City.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations49

Probabilities of Correct Classification in Discriminant Analysis

  • Dec 01, 1966
  • Biometrics
  • Olive Jean Dunn +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations65

Spectral Band Selection for Classification of Soil Organic Matter Content

  • Nov 01, 1989
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Tracey L Henderson +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Effective classification of the prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni

  • Oct 29, 2012
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health
  • Shira A Mitchell +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations70

Outbreak definition by change point analysis: a tool for public health decision?

  • Mar 12, 2016
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • Gaëtan Texier +6
  • Conference Article

Parametric optimization of imaging system based on minimization of image distortion

  • Aug 18, 1998
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  • Volodymyr N Borovytsky +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Detection of Mastitis in Dairy Cattle by Use of Mixture Models for Repeated Somatic Cell Scores: A Bayesian Approach via Gibbs Sampling

  • Nov 01, 2003
  • Journal of Dairy Science
  • J Ødegård +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Calculation of the probability of correct classification in probabilistic bagged k-Nearest Neighbours

  • Jun 29, 2008
  • Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
  • Joe Luis Villa +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Bounds for the Loss in Probability of Correct Classification Under Model Based Approximation

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • Journal of Machine Learning Research
  • Ekdahlmagnus +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Estimating the Probability of a Class at a Point by the Approximation of One Discriminant Function

  • Sep 01, 2018
  • Automation and Remote Control
  • V V Zenkov
  • Conference Article
  • Citations125

Radar micro-doppler for long range front-view gait recognition

  • Sep 01, 2009
  • Dave Tahmoush +1
  • Front Matter
  • Citations108

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of clinical risk models

  • Aug 01, 2001
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Gary L Grunkemeier +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Underwater UXO classification using Matched Subspace Classifier with synthetic sparse dictionaries

  • Sep 01, 2016
  • John J Hall +2
  • Single Report
  • Citations2

Cable Damage Detection System and Algorithms Using Time Domain Reflectometry

  • Mar 24, 2009
  • G Clark +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations111

Experiments in curvature-based segmentation of range data

  • Jan 01, 1995
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • E Trucco +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Prospect Theory Based Crowdsourcing for Classification in the Presence of Spammers

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
  • Baocheng Geng +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.