Improved Mix Column Computation of Cryptographic AES

Encryption is one of the most important security methods in Fifth Generation (5G) networks, offering high speed and security to support enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB), as well as Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications (URLLC). Each algorithm (Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), Data Encryption Standard (DES), ZUC, Synchronous Network-Oriented Word-oriented stream cipher, version 3G (Snow3G)) has distinct strengths and weaknesses in speed and security. Therefore, this research presents two new hybrid models: ZUC-AES (combining the speed of ZUC with the strength of AES) and SNOW3G-DES (combining the speed of SNOW3G with the strength of DES). The models were simulated in MATLAB for data up to 5,000,000 bits, the results simulating six algorithms in MATLAB showed an improvement in strength compared to conventional algorithms, with the p-value on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP 800-22 test improving by approximately average 50% for ZUC-AES (0.4323) compared to ZUC alone (0.288). ZUC was found to be the fastest of all with time 0.85s to 1000000 bit, while the third model, ZUC-AES, achieved superior results compared to AES and DES, while closely matching Snow3G's performance. The study proposed integrating RSA into the system to encrypt keys for secure exchange and increase the strength of encryption.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of US announced Rijndael algorithm as the advanced encryption standard (AES) in October 2000, Despite AES surpassing in security the data encryption standard (DES), it is still rare to be implemented in smart cards, due to the reason of deficient AES coprocessors. Here a chip operation system (COS) called NexCard, which derived from Microsoft's Windows COS, is used as the AES implementation platform. After a suitable COS architecture design for AES and methodology of efficient memory usage, the simulation result shows that direct embedding AES encryption attains 0.56 ms at system clock 15 MHz on the INFINEON SLE66CX322P chip without existence of coprocessor. Corresponding to the development needs in smart card cryptographic algorithm implementations, and different level of the security design specifications, a concept to conjoin numbers of algorithms into single smart card called cipher system on demand (CSOD) method is accomplished in this study concurrently. This is a method utilizing the multiapplication capability of NexCard v2.0 to execute the same AES algorithm as an on-card applet. Although the performance of CSOD is not as good as AES embedded method, CSOD can provide the same result in the situation of adaptability and extendibility.

A new LabVIEW simulation design was applied to provide a comparison study among several types of the most common symmetric and asymmetric encryption algorithms. Also, the comparison with advanced encryption package program was made. The results showed that the new LabVIEW simulation design had advantages in several points, where the evaluated time required for the encryption and decryption processes will be lesser than it values using advanced encryption package program.In this work, the symmetric encryption algorithms were used: AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), DES (Data Encryption Standard), 3DES (Triple Data Encryption Standard) and RC2 (Rivest Cipher) algorithms, while the asymmetric encryption algorithm used was the RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Aldeman) algorithm. The comparison had been achieved using different sizes of text files with different key sizes. The final results proved that the LabVIEW simulation design is better than the Advanced Encryption Package because it increased the algorithm’s performance by 65% in terms of speed and throughput, and for the algorithms’ comparison, the final results showed the effectiveness of AES algorithm over the other algorithms in terms of speed and throughput for the encryption and decryption processes.

File-sharing activities become a bridge for communication in the form of data between one party and another party. File sharing allows users to share data with other users, by uploading data to the server computer and other users can download data from the server computer. A document security system is indispensable to keep document data safe until its destination. File Web Sharing will transmit data with cryptographic methodologies. The algorithm used is Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), Data Encryption Standard (DES), and Blowfish. This study aims to compare the performance of AES, DES, and Blowfish algorithms when implemented to secure file sharing. Performance research results show that the DES algorithm is on average 8.35% faster than AES and the Blowfish algorithm is 7.11% faster than AES. Memory usage capacity testing shows that the AES algorithm requires 4.82% greater memory capacity than Blowfish, and the DES requires 2.41% greater memory capacity than the Blowfish algorithm. Kegiatan file sharing menjadi jembatan komunikasi data antara satu pihak dengan pihak lainnya. File sharing memberikan pengguna kemampuan untuk berbagi data dengan pengguna lain, dengan cara mengunggah data ke komputer server dan pengguna lain dapat mengunduh data dari komputer server. Sistem keamanan terhadap dokumen sangat diperlukan untuk menjaga data dokumen tetap aman sampai tujuannya. Web File Sharing akan mengirimkan data dengan metodologi kriptografi. Algoritma yang digunakan adalah Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), Data Encryption Standard (DES), dan Blowfish. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan kinerja algoritma AES, DES dan Blowfish saat diimplementasikan untuk mengamankan file sharing. Hasil pengujian kinerja menunjukkan bahwa algoritma DES rata-rata 8,35% lebih cepat dibandingkan AES sedangkan Blowfish 7,11% lebih cepat dibandingkan AES. Berdasarkan pengujian kapasitas penggunaan memori terlihat bahwa AES membutuhkan kapasitas memori 4,82% lebih besar dibandingkan Blowfish dan DES membutuhkan kapasitas memori 2,41% lebih besar dari Blowfish.

This paper presents the employment of a DPA attack on the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standardized AES (advance encryption standard) protocol for key retrieval and prevention. Towards key retrieval, we applied the DPA attack on AES to obtain a 128-bit secret key by measuring the power traces of the computations involved in the algorithm. In resistance to the DPA attack, we proposed a countermeasure, or a new modified masking scheme, comprising (i) Boolean and (ii) multiplicative masking, for linear and non-linear operations of AES, respectively. Furthermore, we improved the complexity involved in Boolean masking by introducing Rebecca’s approximation. Moreover, we provide a novel solution to tackle the zero mask problem in multiplicative masking. To evaluate the power traces, we propose our custom correlation technique, which results in a decrease in the calculation time. The synthesis results for original implementation (without countermeasure) and inclusion of countermeasure are given on a Zynq 7020 FPGA (Artix-7 device). It takes 424 FPGA slices when implemented without considering the countermeasure, whereas 714 slices are required to implement AES with the inclusion of the proposed countermeasure. Consequently, the implementation results provide the acceptability of this work for area-constrained applications that require prevention against DPA attacks.

The current fast growing use of the Internet for commercial transactions has created large demands for data protection and network security. IPsec standard and protocols address these demands by providing different mechanisms to ensure integrity, privacy, and authentication of data when it is transmitted, or accessed, via the IP network. Encryption algorithms are by far the most important tools for network and communication security in the IPSec standard. This paper presents a summary of our work to design an efficient implementation of Rijndael algorithm. Rijndael is the new Advanced Encryption Standard adopted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Two different hardware implementations are presented and analyzed. In the first approach, only one lookup table is used to implement the S-Box that performs substitution for all round transformations, which is the bottleneck in the Rijndael algorithm. To achieve optimum speed of data encryption in the feedback mode, access to S-Box is pipelined between rounds. The second realization is based on systolic architecture where sets of Interconnected cells are performing intermediate round transformations. Each cell consists of an S-Box instance with a small combinational circuit to run the round transformation. Verilog design code were developed and synthesized for both implementations, then compared to the existing hardware implementations. It is found that our implementation using standard cell libraries provides much faster encryption rate compared to the reported FPGA and software approach hence it can be deployed in high-speed optical networks.

November 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Rijndael algorithm to determine the new Data Encryption Standard - Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). AES cryptanalysis is one of the most high-profile issue. This review introduces the AES Some New Advances in cryptanalysis: cryptanalysis, including algebra, analysis of energy consumption, related key attacks and attacks based on key arrangement. These sum up, I hope the actual engineering applications to overcome these problems, in order to achieve safe use.

With the rapid development of internet technology and the increasing popularity of e-commerce, data encryption technology plays a very important role in data security. Information security has two aspects: security protocol and cryptographic algorithm and the latter is the foundation and core technology of information security. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption algorithm is one of the most commonly used algorithms in symmetric encryption algorithms. Such algorithms face issues when used in the context of key management and security functions. This paper focuses on the systematic analysis of these issues and summarizes AES algorithm implementation, comprehensive application and algorithm comparison with other existing methods. To analyze the performance of the proposed algorithm and to make full use of the advantages of AES encryption algorithm, one needs to reduce round key and improve the key schedule, as well as organically integrate with RSA algorithm. Java language is used to implement the algorithm due to its large library, then to show the efficiency of the proposed method we compare different parameters, such as encryption/decryption speed, entropies and memory consumption...) with a classic algorithm. Based on the results of the comparison between AES and the hybrid AES algorithm, the proposed algorithm shows good performance and high security. It therefore can be used for key management and security functions, particularly for sharing sensitive files through insecure channel. This analysis provides a reference useful for selecting different encryption algorithms according to different business needs.

An image encryption scheme based on elliptic curve pseudo random and Advanced Encryption System

In recent years, the demand for lightweight cryptographic protocols has grown immensely. To fulfill this necessity, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has initiated a standardization process for lightweight cryptographic encryption. NIST’s call for proposal demands that the scheme should have one primary member that has a key length of 128 bits, and it should be secure up to 2 50 − 1 {2}^{50}-1 byte queries and 2 112 {2}^{112} computations. In this article, we propose a tweakable block cipher (TBC)-based authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD) scheme, which we call mF {\mathsf{mF}} . We provide authenticated encryption security analysis for mF {\mathsf{mF}} under some weaker security assumptions (stated in the article) on the underlying TBC. We instantiate a TBC using block cipher and show that the TBC achieves these weaker securities, provided the key update function has high periodicity. mixFeed {\mathsf{mixFeed}} is a round 2 candidate in the aforementioned lightweight cryptographic standardization competition. When we replace the key update function with the key scheduling function of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), the mF {\mathsf{mF}} mode reduces to mixFeed {\mathsf{mixFeed}} . Recently, the low periodicity of AES key schedule is shown. Exploiting this feature, a practical attack on mixFeed {\mathsf{mixFeed}} is reported. We have shown that multiplication by primitive element satisfies the high periodicity property, and we have a secure instantiation of mF {\mathsf{mF}} , a secure variant of mixFeed {\mathsf{mixFeed}} .

From the Publisher: In October 2000, the US National Institute of Standards and Technology selected the block cipher Rijndael as the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). AES is expected to gradually replace the present Data Encryption Standard (DES) as the most widely applied data encryption technology.|This book by the designers of the block cipher presents Rijndael from scratch. The underlying mathematics and the wide trail strategy as the basic design idea are explained in detail and the basics of differential and linear cryptanalysis are reworked. Subsequent chapters review all known attacks against the Rijndael structure and deal with implementation and optimization issues. Finally, other ciphers related to Rijndael are presented.|This volume is THE authoritative guide to the Rijndael algorithm and AES. Professionals, researchers, and students active or interested in data encryption will find it a valuable source of information and reference.

Data security is the focus of information security. As a primary method, file encryption is adopted for ensuring data security. Encryption algorithms created to meet the Data Encryption Standard (DES) and the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) are widely used in a variety of systems. These algorithms are computationally highly complex, thus, the efficiency of encrypting or decrypting large files can be drastically reduced. To this end, we propose an optimized algorithm that efficiently encrypts and decrypts large files by parallelizing processing tasks on a single heterogeneous many-core processor in the Sunway TaihuLight computer system. Firstly, we convert the serial DES and AES programs to our experimental platform. Then we implement a task assignment strategy to test the converted algorithms. Finally, in order to optimize parallelized algorithms and improve data transmission performance, we apply the master-slave communication optimization, the three-stage parallel pipeline, and vectorization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our optimized algorithm is faster than the state-of-the-art open-source implementations of DES and AES. Compared with the serial processing algorithms, our parallelized DES and AES perform nearly 40 times and 72 times faster, respectively. The work described in this paper leverages existing methods and provides a sound basis for the direction of future research in data encryption.

<p>Cloud computing has spread widely among different organizations due to its advantages, such as cost reduction, resource pooling, broad network access, and ease of administration. It increases the abilities of physical resources by optimizing shared use. Clients’ valuable items (data and applications) are moved outside of regulatory supervision in a shared environment where many clients are grouped together. However, this process poses security concerns, such as sensitive information theft and personally identifiable data leakage. Many researchers have contributed to reducing the problem of data security in cloud computing by developing a variety of technologies to secure cloud data, including encryption. In this study, a set of encryption algorithms (advance encryption standard (AES), data encryption standard (DES), Blowfish, Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) encryption, and international data encryption algorithm (IDEA) was compared in terms of security, data encipherment capacity, memory usage, and encipherment time to determine the optimal algorithm for securing cloud information from hackers. Results show that RSA and IDEA are less secure than AES, Blowfish, and DES). The AES algorithm encrypts a huge amount of data, takes the least encipherment time, and is faster than other algorithms, and the Blowfish algorithm requires the least amount of memory space.</p>

In Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), the standard S-Box is usually generated using a particular irreducible polynomial in GF(28), though it can be generated by 29 others. The focus of the present paper is to show that it is possible to generate secured, AES-like S-Boxes randomly, using a PRNG like BBS and to compare its security with 7 other S-Boxes generated by 7 arbitrarily selected irreducible polynomials from the set. A comparative study has been made by testing the randomness of the ciphertexts generated by the S-Boxes using National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Test Suite, which estimates a P-value to accept or reject the randomness of a bit sequence. It has been found that besides using modular arithmetic, a secured S-Box can be generated by using PRNGs. Moreover, the initial seed of BBS acts as a secondary key of AES.KeywordsAES S-BoxRandom S-BoxNIST test suiteBBS S-BoxAES secondary key

We examine diffusion properties of Rijndael which has been selected by US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for the proposed Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Since the s-box of Rijndael applies a nonlinear transformation operating on each byte of the intermediate cipher result independently, its characteristics have significant effects on the strength of the entire system. The characteristics of Rijndael’s s-box are investigated for the criteria of avalanche, strict avalanche, bit independence, nonlinearity and XOR table distribution. We also evaluate the overall performance for different rounds of Rijndael, and compare it to Safer K-64, in terms of Avalanche Weight Distribution (AWD) criterion.