Expanding the printable design space for lithography processes utilizing a cut mask

Design shrinking beyond the resolution limits of 193 nm optical lithography requires the introduction of double patterning technology (DPT) for the semiconductor industry. Two consecutive lithography and etching process (LELE; Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch) and self aligned double patterning (SADP) process are major two options of DPT.In LELE process, layout patterns are decomposed into two groups and each group is placed on a photo mask. The original layout is reconstructed on a wafer through two lithography with two those photo masks. The two lithography processes are independent because of the intermediate process in between, such as etching and resist freeze. Lithography conditions for each mask are optimized on source mask optimization (SMO) technique to enlarge lithography margin. Conventional SMO technique can be applied to the decomposed patterns since two lithography processes have no interaction as discussed above.In SADP process, a layout is also decomposed into two groups as same as the methodology for LELE process. Either decomposed group is transferred on a wafer, which is named as mandrel. Sidewalls are deposited on the mandrel patterns and the following processes such as etching and mandrel removal reconstruct the original layout.Design rules for DPT consist of two parts. One is for an original layout which is drawn by designers. The other is for each decomposed layout printed by a lithography process. Both design rules have interactions because the original layout which follows the former design rules is decomposed into two groups which follow the latter design rules.In this paper, we will discuss the relation between the two rules above. Furthermore, we will discuss the situation on triple or quadruple patterning.

A more accurate and precise control of overlay performance in lithography process is required as design rule shrinks. Overlay performance is mainly determined by alignment and overlay measurement process, of which alignment and overlay marks play an important role. SADP (Self-aligned double patterning) process becomes widely adopted to realize half pitch of original design for 14nm technology node and beyond. The alignment and overlay marks formed by SADP process differ from traditional ones, which should be well designed to better comply with process condition and reduce the pattern loading effect induced by CMP and ETCH process, and eventually improve overlay performance. In this paper, the alignment behavior of different alignment marks formed via SADP process is investigated. On the other side, the overlay performance of segmented overlay marks is designed and compared with traditional ones to reveal the effect of segmentation on improving the overlay measurement precision and accuracy.

Background: Overlay (OV) is a very important indicator for characterizing the pattern position accuracy between two layers in an integrated circuit in the manufacturing industry. The self-aligned double-patterning (SADP) process, which is limited to the resolution of deep ultraviolet lithography, is being extensively used for the volume manufacturing of integrated circuits. However, compared to the planar process, the SADP process poses new challenges for OV control.Aim: We investigate the bottom grating asymmetry of a microdiffraction-based overlay (μDBO) target in the SADP process and its effect on OV measurement.Approach: The bottom grating of the OV metrology target is analyzed through scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The imbalance of the −1st- and +1st-order diffraction light intensities of the asymmetrical bottom OV target is characterized. Finally, the effects of light polarization and wavelength on the OV accuracy are simulated.Results: Asymmetric behavior of bottom OV grating is identified. OV dependency on the measurement-light polarization is determined. The simulation results indicate that wavelength and polarization affect the OV accuracy simultaneously.Conclusions: We studied the bottom grating asymmetry-induced inaccuracy in DBO measurement and can assist in understanding the mechanism of measurement light-interaction with the OV grating to enhance the DBO accuracy to a new level.

Overlay performance has been a critical factor for advanced semiconductor manufacturing for years. Over time these requirements become more stringent as design rules shrink. Overlay mark design and selection are the first two steps of overlay control, and it is known that different overlay mark designs will have different responses to process conditions. An overlay mark optimized for traditional process might not be suitable for SADP (self-aligned double patterning) technology due to changes in lithography and etching process conditions. For instance, the traditional BIB (box-in-box) target defined by the core mask becomes a template structure in SADP flow, the pitch and cycle of the overlay mark is further changed after spacer formation and core film removal hence the mark recognition and robustness have been challenging for the subsequent process layers. The comprehensive study on the methodology of overlay mark design and selection is still not available for SADP process. In this paper, various types of overlay marks were designed to comply with the SADP process to get rid of the weaknesses of traditional targets. TMU (total measurement uncertainty) performance was adopted to determine the optimal overlay marks for meeting production overlay control requirements in SADP process flow. The results have suggested the segmented marks outperform to non-segmented marks on image contrast as well as TMU.

Self-aligned double patterning (SADP) is being applied to 7nm technology node and below for back-end metal layers (routing layers) with pitches down to ~40nm. Unlike the traditional litho-etch-litho-etch (LELE) approach, SADP splits pitch using spacers whose 2nd pattern (Color-B) is self-aligned to its 1st pattern (Color-A). As a result, the SADP approach produces less variation than LELE approach by removing the second pattern misalignment on Si. Although SADP provides better overlay controllability than LELE, it still encounters many challenges. One of the challenges is controlling the 2nd patterning linewidth and uniformity. In general, the Color-B critical dimension (CD) has a larger variation than Color-A CD in the SADP process using Mandrel structure. In this paper, we investigate variations to the SADP Color-B CD based on self-aligned litho-etch litho-etch (SALELE) process flow, including the lithographic CD uniformity, hard mask etching, spacer etch and final Si etch. The corresponding contribution to Color-B CD variation is analyzed each step. After the major contributors to Color-B variation are identified, an experiment was designed to reduce Color-B pattern variation during the process. The silicon results show that compared with the old process condition, the new process can reduce Color-B variation significantly. With this new process, Color-B variation is comparable to Color-A variation.

New alignment mark designs in single patterning and self-aligned double patterning

With extreme UV not ready for HVM for the 20nm and 14nm nodes, double patterning options that extend the use of 193nm immersion lithography beyond the optical resolution limits, such as LELE (Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch) and SADP (Self Aligned Double Patterning), are being used for critical layers for these nodes. LELE requires very stringent overlay capability of the optical exposure tool. The spacer scheme of SADP starts with a conformal film of material around the mandrels and etched along the mandrel sidewalls to form patterns with doubled frequency. SADP, while having the advantage of being a self-aligned process, adds a number of process steps and strict control of the mandrel profile is required. In this paper, we will demonstrate a novel technique - ASDP (Anti-Spacer Double Patterning), which uses only spin-on materials to achieve self-aligned double patterning. After initial resist patterning, an Anti-Spacer Generator (ASG) material is coated on the resist pattern to create the developable spacer region. Another layer of material is then coated and processed to generate the second pattern in between the first resist pattern. We were able to define 37.5nm half pitch pattern features using this technique as well as sub-resolution features for an asymmetric pattern. In this paper we will review the capability of the process in terms of CD control and LWR (line width roughness) and discuss the limitations of the process.

As EUV direct patterning begins to hit its resolution limit, the need for EUV self-aligned double patterning (SADP) has arisen in order to reach sub-30 nm pitch. Currently, EUV resists suffer from several shortcomings, both in terms of roughness and resist budget. These constraints means using it directly as a mandrel material, as previously done for immersion lithography SADP is nearly impossible. Consequently, standard EUV SADP flows involve the transfer of the resist through a lithography stack and into a hard mandrel material, such as silicon nitride or amorphous silicon.¹ Achieving line edge roughness (LER) and line width roughness (LWR) targets for an EUV SADP hard mandrel is significantly more challenging than for EUV direct print since the etch process needs to target a post etch CD of about half that of the lithographic CD. This aggressive shrink requirement usually involves degradation in roughness driven by high aspect ratios. To circumvent these issues, we have developed a new bottom up organic mandrel growth process, whereby the EUV resist can be grown to a height compatible with a resist mandrel SADP flow, while the roughness is improved and the critical dimension is controlled. This bottom up mandrel growth process is performed in an etch chamber and can therefore be easily coupled with other process steps. The mandrel height and critical dimensions can be easily tuned from the incoming lithography by changing the deposition and trim step times of the process. We have shown that this bottom-up grown mandrel can withstand typical ALD spacer process deposition. After spacer open, the organic material can be easily removed through an in-situ ash process before opening the underlayer. This integration will allow for the removal of the organic planarizing layer in the lithography stack, reducing the stack complexity, while also eliminating one of the major contributors to wiggling in the typical hard mandrel patterning scheme. In this paper, the performance of this new integration scheme was benchmarked against a more standard SADP flow. The roughness performance post mandrel formation and post spacer deposition for this new scheme is significantly improved over our standard EUV SADP baseline using a standard EUV SADP flow.

We report a sub-30-nm pitch self-aligned double patterning (SADP) integration scheme with EUV lithography coupled with self-aligned block technology targeting the back end of line metal line patterning applications for logic nodes beyond 5 nm. The integration demonstration is a validation of the scalability of a previously reported flow, which used 193-nm immersion SADP targeting a 40-nm pitch with the same material sets (Si3N4 mandrel, SiO2 spacer, spin on carbon, spin on glass). The multicolor integration approach is successfully demonstrated and provides a valuable method to address overlay concerns and, more generally, edge placement error as a whole for advanced process nodes. Unbiased line edge roughness (LER)/line width roughness (LWR) analysis comparison between EUV SADP and 193-nm immersion SADP shows that both integrations follow the same trend throughout the process steps. While EUV SADP shows increased LER after mandrel pull, metal hardmask open, and dielectric etch compared to 193-nm immersion SADP, the final process performance is matched in terms of LWR (1.08-nm 3 sigma unbiased) and is 6% higher than 193-nm immersion SADP for average unbiased LER. Using EUV, SADP enables almost doubling the line density while keeping most of the remaining processes and films unchanged and provides a compelling alternative to other multipatterning integrations, which present their own sets of challenges.

As the technology nodes scale down to sub-22 nm, double patterning lithography has been considered as a practical solution for layout manufacturing. Compared with litho-etch-litho-etch, self-aligned double patterning (SADP) has better overlay control. To have a better SADP layout decomposability of routing patterns, we consider SADP during detailed routing stage. Two major types of SADP processes are considered: 1) spacer-is-dielectric type and 2) spacer-is-metal type. Different from previous works, the idea of color preassignment is adopted for SADP-aware detailed routing. An elegant graph model is proposed to capture both routing and SADP manufacturing cost. They greatly simplify the problem to maintain SADP design rules in detailed routing. We apply a negotiated congestion based rip-up and reroute scheme to achieve better routability while maintaining SADP design rules. Compared with other state-of-the-art academic works, our approach does not produce any side overlay error and no SADP design rules violation is reported. Meanwhile, a better solution in terms of total wirelength, routability, and runtime is achieved.

EUV is an ongoing industry challenge to adopt due to its current throughput limitations. The approach to improve throughput has primarily been through a significant focus on source power which has been a continuing challenge for the industry. The subject of this paper is to review and investigate the application of SADP (Self aligned double patterning) as a speed enhancing technique for EUV processing. A process with the potential of running a 16 nm self-aligned final etched pattern in less than 10mJ exposure range is proposed. Many of the current challenges with shot noise and resolution change significantly when SADP is used in conjunction with EUV. In particular, the resolution challenge for a 16nm HP final pattern type image changes to 32nm as an initial pattern requirement for the patterned CD. With this larger CD starting point, the burden of shot noise changes significantly and the ability for higher speed resist formulations to be used is enabled. Further resist candidates that may have not met the resolution requirements for EUV can also be evaluated. This implies a completely different operational set-point for EUV resist chemistry where the relaxation of both LER and CD together combined, give the resist formulation space a new target when EUV is used as a SADP tool. Post processing mitigation of LWR is needed to attain the performance of the final 16nm half pitch target pattern to align with the industry needs. If the original process flow at an 85W projected source power would run in the 50WPH range, then the flow proposed here would run in the <120WPH range. Although it is a double patterning technology, the proposed process still only requires a single pass through the EUV tool, This speed benefit can be used to offset the added costs associated with the double patterning process. This flow can then be shown to be an enabling approach for many EUV applications.

Photolithography has been a driving force behind semiconductor scaling, but the technology has been at a standstill since the development of 193-nm water-based immersion lithography. As a consequence, the double patterning process has become the standard technology for diverse types of semiconductor devices as a means of extending the life of 193-nm exposure technology. We have previously reported on the extendibility and versatility of the double patterning process, from pitch-doubling by self-aligned double patterning (SADP)[1] to pitch-quadrupling by self-aligned quadruple patterning (SAQP)[2]. We also reported on the effectiveness of SADP technology for increasing resolution in hole patterns. While waiting for the development of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography tools to be completed, it will be necessary to search out possibilities for further semiconductor scaling using the double patterning process as the mainstream technique for extending the life of 193-nm immersion lithography.

Among double patterning techniques, Self-aligned double patterning (SADP) has the advantage of good mask overlay control, which has made SADP a popular double patterning method for sub-32nm technology nodes. However, SADP process places several limitations on design flexibility. This work exploits an alternative post routing approach that has the flexibility to resolve lithography violations without the overhead of repeated rule checking. In addition, it allows for successive refinement in the definition of lithographic violations as the process node matures, and implementation of fixes as localized ECO (Engineering Change Order) operations without needing to reroute the complete design.

Self-Aligned-Double-Patterning (SADP) is a potential technology for metal layers in N10 and beyond nodes. SADP manufacturing process comes with lots of challenges. Several approaches were introduced to manufacture SADP. The most major SADP manufacturing approach is the Spacer-Is-Dielectric (SID). One of the main advantages of SADP over Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch (LELE) Double Patterning (DP) is better Mask Overlay Control. In addition, SADP results in better process tolerance and lower Line-Width Roughness. In this paper, we propose a model-based manufacturing flow for SID-SADP approach. The flow includes: (1) SADP Patterns Decomposition, (2) Etch Retargeting, (3) Sub Resolution Assist Features (SRAF) Insertion, (4) Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) process, and finally (5) Verification. The motivation beyond developing this flow is to find the least number of needed masks to achieve satisfactory imaging quality, and to characterize possible challenges in each step of the flow. Consequently, we highlight the challenges and the proposed techniques we examined to meet this objective.

Extreme ultra-violet lithography (EUVL) has been prepared for next generation lithography for several years. We could get sub-22 nm line and space (L/S) pattern using EUVL, but there are still some problems such as roughness, sensitivity, and resolution. According to 2007 ITRS roadmap, line edge roughness (LER) has to be below 1.9 nm to get a 22 nm node, but it is too difficult to control line width roughness (LWR) because line width is determined by not only the post exposure bake (PEB) time, temperature and acid diffusion length, but also the component and size of the resist. A new method is suggested to reduce the roughness. The surface roughness can be smoothed by applying the resist reflow process (RRP) for the developed resist. We made resist profile which has surface roughness by applying exposure, PEB and development process for line and space pattern. The surface roughness is calculated by changing parameters such as the protected ratio of resin. The PEB time is also varied. We compared difference between 1:1 L/S and 1:3 L/S pattern for 22 nm. Developed resist baked above the glass transition temperature will flow and the surface will be smoothed. As a result, LER and LWR will be much smaller after RRP. The result shows that the decreasing ratio of LER due to RRP is larger when initial LER is large. We believe that current ~ 5 nm LWR can be smoothed to ~ 1 nm by using RRP after develop.